In this paper, structural shape of stent has been optimized using NURBS for parameterization of stent structure and target those objectives which are critical for vascular injury. NURBS modeling is done using python coding in RHINO 3D software. For later part of the design, Solidworks is used. The objectives considered in our study are dogboning, foreshortening and arterial wall stresses, all of which are strongly linked to vascular injury leading to restenosis. We use control point weights, strut thickness and strut width as design variables for Latin Hypercube sampling (LHS) in order to generate dataset for Stent deployment simulations. In our study, we generate 80 design data points using LHS in Matlab R2014a. Finite element analysis of stent deployment process is then carried out using ANSYS for all 80 designs of stent generated using LHS. Thereafter, we use Kriging for surrogate modeling and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) in MATLAB for multi-objective design optimization so as to minimize dogboning, foreshortening and arterial wall stresses. As a result, we obtain a range of pareto optimal design parameter values which can be used in clinical design guides so as to accommodate variations observed across different patients.
| Published in | Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13 |
| Page(s) | 39-47 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Stent, Kriging, Foreshortening, Recoil Ratio, Maximum Stress, Optimization
| [1] | Foin, N., Lee, R. D., Torii, R., Guitierrez-Chico, J. L., Mattesini, A., Nijjer, S., & Joner, M. (2014). Impact of stent strut design in metallic stents and biodegradable scaffolds. International journal of cardiology, 177 (3), 800-808. |
| [2] | SCHWARTZ, R. S., & HOLMES, D. R. (1994). Pigs, dogs, baboons, and man: lessons for stenting from animal studies. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 7 (4), 355-368. |
| [3] | Kelliher, D., Clune, R., Campbell, J. S., Robinson, J. C., Appelbe, B., & Buttimer, C. (2008). Sensitivity of shape change on the performance of stainless steel cardio-vascular stents. In Proceedings of the 7th ASMO UK conference on engineering design optimization, Bath (pp. 274-283). |
| [4] | Pant, S., Bressloff, N. W., & Limbert, G. (2012). Geometry parameterization and multidisciplinary constrained optimization of coronary stents. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 11 (1-2), 61-82. |
| [5] | Clune, R., Kelliher, D., Robinson, J. C., & Campbell, J. S. (2014). NURBS modeling and structural shape optimization of cardiovascular stents. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 50 (1), 159-168. |
| [6] | Rogers David, F., & Earnshaw, R. A. (1991). State of the Art in Computer Graphics-Visualization and Modeling. |
| [7] | Pant, S., Limbert, G., Curzen, N. P., & Bressloff, N. W. (2011). Multiobjective design optimisation of coronary stents. Biomaterials, 32 (31), 7755-7773. |
| [8] | Li, N., Zhang, H., & Ouyang, H. (2009). Shape optimization of coronary artery stent based on a parametric model. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 45 (6), 468-475. |
| [9] | Tammareddi, S., Sun, G., & Li, Q. (2016). Multiobjective robust optimization of coronary stents. Materials & Design, 90, 682-692. |
| [10] | McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 2000 Feb 1;42 (1):55-61. |
| [11] | Iman RL, Conover WJ. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. with an application to risk assessment. Communications in statistics-theory and methods. 1980 Jan 1; 9 (17):1749-842. |
| [12] | Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O. On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Structural safety. 2003 Jan 31;25 (1): 47-68. |
| [13] | Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2006 Sep 30;91 (9): 992-1007. |
APA Style
Anierudh Vishwanathan. (2017). Shape Optimization of a NURBS Modelled Coronary Stent Using Kriging and Genetic Algorithm. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research, 1(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13
ACS Style
Anierudh Vishwanathan. Shape Optimization of a NURBS Modelled Coronary Stent Using Kriging and Genetic Algorithm. Cardiol. Cardiovasc. Res. 2017, 1(2), 39-47. doi: 10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13,
author = {Anierudh Vishwanathan},
title = {Shape Optimization of a NURBS Modelled Coronary Stent Using Kriging and Genetic Algorithm},
journal = {Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {39-47},
doi = {10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ccr.20170102.13},
abstract = {In this paper, structural shape of stent has been optimized using NURBS for parameterization of stent structure and target those objectives which are critical for vascular injury. NURBS modeling is done using python coding in RHINO 3D software. For later part of the design, Solidworks is used. The objectives considered in our study are dogboning, foreshortening and arterial wall stresses, all of which are strongly linked to vascular injury leading to restenosis. We use control point weights, strut thickness and strut width as design variables for Latin Hypercube sampling (LHS) in order to generate dataset for Stent deployment simulations. In our study, we generate 80 design data points using LHS in Matlab R2014a. Finite element analysis of stent deployment process is then carried out using ANSYS for all 80 designs of stent generated using LHS. Thereafter, we use Kriging for surrogate modeling and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) in MATLAB for multi-objective design optimization so as to minimize dogboning, foreshortening and arterial wall stresses. As a result, we obtain a range of pareto optimal design parameter values which can be used in clinical design guides so as to accommodate variations observed across different patients.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Shape Optimization of a NURBS Modelled Coronary Stent Using Kriging and Genetic Algorithm AU - Anierudh Vishwanathan Y1 - 2017/04/17 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13 T2 - Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research JF - Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research JO - Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research SP - 39 EP - 47 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8914 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ccr.20170102.13 AB - In this paper, structural shape of stent has been optimized using NURBS for parameterization of stent structure and target those objectives which are critical for vascular injury. NURBS modeling is done using python coding in RHINO 3D software. For later part of the design, Solidworks is used. The objectives considered in our study are dogboning, foreshortening and arterial wall stresses, all of which are strongly linked to vascular injury leading to restenosis. We use control point weights, strut thickness and strut width as design variables for Latin Hypercube sampling (LHS) in order to generate dataset for Stent deployment simulations. In our study, we generate 80 design data points using LHS in Matlab R2014a. Finite element analysis of stent deployment process is then carried out using ANSYS for all 80 designs of stent generated using LHS. Thereafter, we use Kriging for surrogate modeling and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) in MATLAB for multi-objective design optimization so as to minimize dogboning, foreshortening and arterial wall stresses. As a result, we obtain a range of pareto optimal design parameter values which can be used in clinical design guides so as to accommodate variations observed across different patients. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: