| Peer-Reviewed

Back from the Bread: Delayed Presentation of an Ingested Foreign Body

Received: 8 January 2022    Accepted: 5 February 2022    Published: 16 February 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Foreign body ingestion is often uneventful and rarely requires surgical intervention. It can however become problematic, predominantly affecting the gastrointestinal tract or more rarely the genitourinary tract. Few cases of the latter have been described. Objective: The aim of this case report is to raise awareness of the potentially indolent presentation of foreign body ingestion resulting in urological complications. Method: We report a unique case of a forty year old presenting with suprapubic pain, urgency and frequency twenty years following inadvertent ingestion of a needle. Results: Following initial investigation for common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms, ultrasound and computer tomography located the needle within a perivesical cavity associated with the bladder dome. Attempted removal via laparoscopy and open approach was unsuccessful. The patient ultimately underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy in order to excise the cavity and foreign body. Conclusion: Extra-luminal migration of foreign bodies from the gastrointestinal to the genitourinary tract is rare but should be considered as a differential for urological symptoms in difficult cases when the aetiology remains elusive. Access to radiological imaging remains vital to enabling verification of the diagnosis. Optimal management involves localisation and excision of the foreign body and any containing cavity or fistulae. This may require advanced techniques including intra-operative imaging and a robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach.

Published in International Journal of Clinical Urology (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15
Page(s) 19-22
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Foreign Object, Cystitis, Partial Cystectomy, Robotic

References
[1] Wright C, Closson F. Updates in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Foreign Bodies. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2013; 60 (5): 1221-1239. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24093905/.
[2] Arana A, Hauser B, Hachimi-Idrissi S, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood and review of the literature. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2001; 160: 468–72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11548183/.
[3] Pinero Madrona A, Fernández Hernández JA, Carrasco Prats M, Riquelme Riquelme J, Parrila Paricio P. Intestinal perforation by foreign bodies. European Journal of Surgery. 2000Apr; 166 (4): 307-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10817327/.
[4] Henderson C, Engel J, Schlesinger P. Foreign Body Ingestion: Review and Suggested Guidelines for Management. Endoscopy. 1987; 19 (02): 68-71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3552641/.
[5] Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, Knoefel WT. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Deutsches Arztebatl International. 2012; 109 (50): 869-875. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23293675/.
[6] Kramer R, Lerner D, Lin T, Manfredi M, Shah M, Stephen T et al. Management of Ingested Foreign Bodies in Children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition. 2015; 60 (4): 562-574. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25611037/.
[7] Wykes W, Barker JR. Urethral discharge associated with ingested foreign body. British medical journal. 1978; 2 (6154): 1751. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1609978/.
[8] Misra S, Jain V, Ahmad F, Kumar R, Kichore N. Metallic sewing needle ingestion presenting as acute abdomen. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2013; 16 (4): 540-543. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974755/.
[9] Bhardwaj M, Hong S, Berkowitz D. Where did the problem stem from? An unusual case of hematemesis and hematuria American Journal of Gastroenterology 2019; 114: doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000597404.45137.92.
[10] Tombolini F, Lacetera V, Muzzonigro G. Enterovesical Fistula Caused by a Toothpick. Case Reports in Urology. 2015; 2015: 1-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25838964/.
[11] Clements M, Hedrick T, Colen D, Schenkman N. Colovesical Fistula Caused by an Ingested Chicken Bone. Urology. 2013; 82 (6): e37-e38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24295267/.
[12] Zezos P, Oikonomou A, Souftas V, Gkotsis D, Pitiakoudis M, Kouklakis G. Endoscopic removal of a toothpick perforating the sigmoid colon and causing chronic abdominal pain: a case report. Cases Journal. 2009; 2 (1): 8469. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19918434/.
[13] Garcia-Segui A, Bercowsky E, Gómez-Fernández I, Gibernau R, Gascón Mir M. Late migration of a toothpick into the bladder: initial presentation with urosepsis and hydronephrosis. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia. 2012; 65 (6): 626-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22832645/.
[14] Fung B, Sweetser S, Song L, Tabibian J. Foreign object ingestion and esophageal food impaction: An update and review on endoscopic management. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2019; 11 (3): 174-192. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425280/.
[15] Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3 (1): e1918911. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3192255.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Rachel Hawthorne, Anthony Koupparis. (2022). Back from the Bread: Delayed Presentation of an Ingested Foreign Body. International Journal of Clinical Urology, 6(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Rachel Hawthorne; Anthony Koupparis. Back from the Bread: Delayed Presentation of an Ingested Foreign Body. Int. J. Clin. Urol. 2022, 6(1), 19-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Rachel Hawthorne, Anthony Koupparis. Back from the Bread: Delayed Presentation of an Ingested Foreign Body. Int J Clin Urol. 2022;6(1):19-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15,
      author = {Rachel Hawthorne and Anthony Koupparis},
      title = {Back from the Bread: Delayed Presentation of an Ingested Foreign Body},
      journal = {International Journal of Clinical Urology},
      volume = {6},
      number = {1},
      pages = {19-22},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcu.20220601.15},
      abstract = {Background: Foreign body ingestion is often uneventful and rarely requires surgical intervention. It can however become problematic, predominantly affecting the gastrointestinal tract or more rarely the genitourinary tract. Few cases of the latter have been described. Objective: The aim of this case report is to raise awareness of the potentially indolent presentation of foreign body ingestion resulting in urological complications. Method: We report a unique case of a forty year old presenting with suprapubic pain, urgency and frequency twenty years following inadvertent ingestion of a needle. Results: Following initial investigation for common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms, ultrasound and computer tomography located the needle within a perivesical cavity associated with the bladder dome. Attempted removal via laparoscopy and open approach was unsuccessful. The patient ultimately underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy in order to excise the cavity and foreign body. Conclusion: Extra-luminal migration of foreign bodies from the gastrointestinal to the genitourinary tract is rare but should be considered as a differential for urological symptoms in difficult cases when the aetiology remains elusive. Access to radiological imaging remains vital to enabling verification of the diagnosis. Optimal management involves localisation and excision of the foreign body and any containing cavity or fistulae. This may require advanced techniques including intra-operative imaging and a robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Back from the Bread: Delayed Presentation of an Ingested Foreign Body
    AU  - Rachel Hawthorne
    AU  - Anthony Koupparis
    Y1  - 2022/02/16
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15
    T2  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
    JF  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
    JO  - International Journal of Clinical Urology
    SP  - 19
    EP  - 22
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1355
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcu.20220601.15
    AB  - Background: Foreign body ingestion is often uneventful and rarely requires surgical intervention. It can however become problematic, predominantly affecting the gastrointestinal tract or more rarely the genitourinary tract. Few cases of the latter have been described. Objective: The aim of this case report is to raise awareness of the potentially indolent presentation of foreign body ingestion resulting in urological complications. Method: We report a unique case of a forty year old presenting with suprapubic pain, urgency and frequency twenty years following inadvertent ingestion of a needle. Results: Following initial investigation for common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms, ultrasound and computer tomography located the needle within a perivesical cavity associated with the bladder dome. Attempted removal via laparoscopy and open approach was unsuccessful. The patient ultimately underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy in order to excise the cavity and foreign body. Conclusion: Extra-luminal migration of foreign bodies from the gastrointestinal to the genitourinary tract is rare but should be considered as a differential for urological symptoms in difficult cases when the aetiology remains elusive. Access to radiological imaging remains vital to enabling verification of the diagnosis. Optimal management involves localisation and excision of the foreign body and any containing cavity or fistulae. This may require advanced techniques including intra-operative imaging and a robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Bristol Urology Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

  • Bristol Urology Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

  • Sections