Children with special educational needs (SEN) remain underserved in many systems, and teacher preparation is pivotal for inclusive education. This study explored the readiness and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers (PSTs) at the University of Cape Coast to teach children with SEN. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, we conducted a qualitative case study with PSTs who had completed a special education practicum. Using purposive sampling, ten PSTs (six females, four males) participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews lasted 15–20 minutes and followed a 17-item guide piloted with a comparable cohort; participation continued until thematic saturation was achieved. Data were analysed with reflexive thematic analysis, progressing through familiarisation, coding, theme development, review, and definition; trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, audit trail, rich description, and peer debrief. Ethical approval was obtained from the University’s IRB. Two overarching domains were developed: readiness to teach children with SEN and self-efficacy for inclusive practice. Under readiness, participants reported (i) high perceived readiness grounded in practicum-derived mastery experiences; (ii) developed skill sets for adapting instruction; (iii) growing knowledge for identifying SEN via observation, performance, and assessment; and (iv) positive, empathic attitudes anchored in a sense of duty and care. Under self-efficacy, participants described (i) confidence built through authentic teaching encounters (e.g., supporting learners with autism); (ii) instructional approaches centred on needs-based differentiation and the use of varied teaching-learning materials, visuals, and structured scaffolds; (iii) strategies for impact such as breaking tasks into manageable steps and cultivating belonging; (iv) classroom management anchored in thorough lesson preparation and active engagement; and (v) professionalism that respects individual differences and promotes equitable participation. Practicum exposure, coupled with targeted coursework, appears to be the critical lever shaping PSTs’ readiness and self-efficacy for inclusive education in this setting. Strengthening practicum design (e.g., longer placements, structured mentoring, explicit assessment of adaptive instruction), resourcing schools with appropriate materials, and embedding continuous professional development can consolidate these gains and support system-level inclusion goals. While the single-institution, small sample limits transferability, the findings provide actionable insight for programme leaders and policymakers seeking to align teacher education with Ghana’s inclusive education agenda. Future studies should triangulate perspectives across institutions and employ longitudinal or mixed-methods designs to track how perceived readiness and efficacy translate into classroom practice and learner outcomes.
| Published in | International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17 |
| Page(s) | 302-308 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pre-Service Teachers, Special Educational Needs, Self-Efficacy, Readiness, Inclusive Education
| [1] | UNESCO. Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris: UNESCO; 2009. Available from: |
| [2] |
UNICEF. UNICEF Annual Report 2021. New York (NY): UNICEF; 2022. Available from:
https://www.unicef.org/reports/unicef-annual-report-2021 (UNICEF) |
| [3] | Ministry of Education (Ghana). Inclusive Education Policy. Accra: Special Education Division, GES; 2015. |
| [4] |
UNICEF. The State of the World’s Children 2021: On my mind—Promoting, protecting and caring for children’s mental health. New York (NY): UNICEF; 2021. Available from:
https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2021 (UNICEF) |
| [5] | World Health Organization & World Bank. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011. |
| [6] | Lamichhane K, Kawakatsu Y. Disability and determinants of schooling: A case from Bangladesh. Int J Educ Dev. 2015; 40: 98–105. |
| [7] |
World Health Organization; World Bank. World report on disability 2011. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2011. Available from:
https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44575 (WHO Apps) |
| [8] | United Nations, 1993. United Nations. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. New York: UN; 1993. |
| [9] | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris (FR): UNESCO; 2009. Available from: |
| [10] |
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). The way forward: A disability-inclusive development agenda towards 2015 and beyond. New York (NY): United Nations; 2013. Available from:
https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/reports/2013/2013-06-27_a-disability-inclusive-agenda.pdf |
| [11] | Rabi NM, Ghazali NHC, Rohaizad NAA, Zulkefli MY. Readiness of pre-service teacher… Int J Acad Res Prog Educ Dev. 2018; 7(4): 200–210. |
| [12] | Nketsia W, Saloviita T. Pre-service teachers’ views on inclusive education in Ghana. J Educ Teach. 2013; 39(4): 429–441. |
| [13] | Mertens DM. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2019. |
| [14] | Cobbold C. Engaging with methodological issues in qualitative research… 2015. (as listed in manuscript) |
| [15] | Dworkin SL. Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Arch Sex Behav. 2012; 41(6): 1319–1320. |
| [16] | Faulkner SL, Trotter SP. Theoretical saturation. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. 2017. |
| [17] | Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Handbook of Research Methods in Health & Social Sciences. 2019. |
| [18] | Shippen ME, Crites SA, Houchins DE, Ramsey ML, Simon M. Preservice teachers’ perceptions of including students with disabilities. Teach Educ Spec Educ. 2005; 28(2): 92–99. |
| [19] | Sharma U, Forlin C, Loreman T, Earle C. Attitudes, concerns and sentiments… Int J Special Educ. 2006; 21(2): 80–93. |
| [20] | Hemmings B, Woodcock S. Pre-service teachers’ views of inclusive education: A content analysis. Australas J Spec Educ. 2011; 35(2): 103–116. |
| [21] | Alkahtani KD. Teachers’ knowledge and use of assistive technology… J Stud Educ. 2013; 3(2): 65–86. |
| [22] | Batsiou S, Bebetsos E, Panteli P, Antoniou P. Attitudes and intention… Int J Inclusive Educ. 2008; 12(2): 201–219. |
| [23] | Dapudong RC. Teachers’ knowledge and attitude towards inclusive education. Int J Learn Dev. 2014; 4(4): 1–24. |
| [24] | Peebles JL, Mendaglio S. The impact of direct experience on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy… Int J Inclusive Educ. 2014; 18(12): 1321–1336. |
| [25] | Sharma U, Shaukat S, Furlonger B. Attitudes and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers towards inclusion in Pakistan. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2015; 15(2): 97–105. |
| [26] | Rankin-Erickson JL, Pressley M. Instructional practices of special-education teachers… Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2000; 15(4): 206–225. |
| [27] | Zigmond NP, Kloo A. General and special education are (and should be) different. In: Handbook of Special Education. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2017. p. 249–261. |
| [28] | Hans A, Hans ME. Classroom management is prerequisite for effective teaching. Int J English Educ. 2017; 6(2): 273–283. |
APA Style
Nsiah, R. E., Baidoo, V., Setorglo, J. (2025). A Qualitative Insight into Pre-Service Teachers’ Level of Readiness and Self-Efficacy to Teach Children with Special Educational Needs. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 10(5), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17
ACS Style
Nsiah, R. E.; Baidoo, V.; Setorglo, J. A Qualitative Insight into Pre-Service Teachers’ Level of Readiness and Self-Efficacy to Teach Children with Special Educational Needs. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2025, 10(5), 302-308. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17,
author = {Rockson Ebenezer Nsiah and Victoria Baidoo and Jacob Setorglo},
title = {A Qualitative Insight into Pre-Service Teachers’ Level of Readiness and Self-Efficacy to Teach Children with Special Educational Needs
},
journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {302-308},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20251005.17},
abstract = {Children with special educational needs (SEN) remain underserved in many systems, and teacher preparation is pivotal for inclusive education. This study explored the readiness and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers (PSTs) at the University of Cape Coast to teach children with SEN. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, we conducted a qualitative case study with PSTs who had completed a special education practicum. Using purposive sampling, ten PSTs (six females, four males) participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews lasted 15–20 minutes and followed a 17-item guide piloted with a comparable cohort; participation continued until thematic saturation was achieved. Data were analysed with reflexive thematic analysis, progressing through familiarisation, coding, theme development, review, and definition; trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, audit trail, rich description, and peer debrief. Ethical approval was obtained from the University’s IRB. Two overarching domains were developed: readiness to teach children with SEN and self-efficacy for inclusive practice. Under readiness, participants reported (i) high perceived readiness grounded in practicum-derived mastery experiences; (ii) developed skill sets for adapting instruction; (iii) growing knowledge for identifying SEN via observation, performance, and assessment; and (iv) positive, empathic attitudes anchored in a sense of duty and care. Under self-efficacy, participants described (i) confidence built through authentic teaching encounters (e.g., supporting learners with autism); (ii) instructional approaches centred on needs-based differentiation and the use of varied teaching-learning materials, visuals, and structured scaffolds; (iii) strategies for impact such as breaking tasks into manageable steps and cultivating belonging; (iv) classroom management anchored in thorough lesson preparation and active engagement; and (v) professionalism that respects individual differences and promotes equitable participation. Practicum exposure, coupled with targeted coursework, appears to be the critical lever shaping PSTs’ readiness and self-efficacy for inclusive education in this setting. Strengthening practicum design (e.g., longer placements, structured mentoring, explicit assessment of adaptive instruction), resourcing schools with appropriate materials, and embedding continuous professional development can consolidate these gains and support system-level inclusion goals. While the single-institution, small sample limits transferability, the findings provide actionable insight for programme leaders and policymakers seeking to align teacher education with Ghana’s inclusive education agenda. Future studies should triangulate perspectives across institutions and employ longitudinal or mixed-methods designs to track how perceived readiness and efficacy translate into classroom practice and learner outcomes.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Qualitative Insight into Pre-Service Teachers’ Level of Readiness and Self-Efficacy to Teach Children with Special Educational Needs AU - Rockson Ebenezer Nsiah AU - Victoria Baidoo AU - Jacob Setorglo Y1 - 2025/10/31 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17 T2 - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society JF - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society JO - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society SP - 302 EP - 308 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3363 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20251005.17 AB - Children with special educational needs (SEN) remain underserved in many systems, and teacher preparation is pivotal for inclusive education. This study explored the readiness and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers (PSTs) at the University of Cape Coast to teach children with SEN. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, we conducted a qualitative case study with PSTs who had completed a special education practicum. Using purposive sampling, ten PSTs (six females, four males) participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews lasted 15–20 minutes and followed a 17-item guide piloted with a comparable cohort; participation continued until thematic saturation was achieved. Data were analysed with reflexive thematic analysis, progressing through familiarisation, coding, theme development, review, and definition; trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, audit trail, rich description, and peer debrief. Ethical approval was obtained from the University’s IRB. Two overarching domains were developed: readiness to teach children with SEN and self-efficacy for inclusive practice. Under readiness, participants reported (i) high perceived readiness grounded in practicum-derived mastery experiences; (ii) developed skill sets for adapting instruction; (iii) growing knowledge for identifying SEN via observation, performance, and assessment; and (iv) positive, empathic attitudes anchored in a sense of duty and care. Under self-efficacy, participants described (i) confidence built through authentic teaching encounters (e.g., supporting learners with autism); (ii) instructional approaches centred on needs-based differentiation and the use of varied teaching-learning materials, visuals, and structured scaffolds; (iii) strategies for impact such as breaking tasks into manageable steps and cultivating belonging; (iv) classroom management anchored in thorough lesson preparation and active engagement; and (v) professionalism that respects individual differences and promotes equitable participation. Practicum exposure, coupled with targeted coursework, appears to be the critical lever shaping PSTs’ readiness and self-efficacy for inclusive education in this setting. Strengthening practicum design (e.g., longer placements, structured mentoring, explicit assessment of adaptive instruction), resourcing schools with appropriate materials, and embedding continuous professional development can consolidate these gains and support system-level inclusion goals. While the single-institution, small sample limits transferability, the findings provide actionable insight for programme leaders and policymakers seeking to align teacher education with Ghana’s inclusive education agenda. Future studies should triangulate perspectives across institutions and employ longitudinal or mixed-methods designs to track how perceived readiness and efficacy translate into classroom practice and learner outcomes. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -