The present study investigates a comprehensive treatment strategy for managing acidic effluent generated during the hydrometallurgical processing of discarded lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), specifically following cobalt oxalate precipitation. The effluent, characterized by extremely low pH (0.1), high total dissolved solids (TDS = 50,000 mg/L), and elevated chemical oxygen demand (COD = 1640 mg/L), was treated through a sequential combination of coagulation, adsorption, and distillation. Coagulation using ferric sulfate achieved 34% TDS reduction through precipitation of dissolved metal ions and oxalates. Subsequent adsorption employing thermally activated carbon derived from waste RO filters further reduced TDS by ~55% due to enhanced surface area and porous structure. Final distillation at 150°C yielded a >99% decrease in TDS and COD, producing condensate meeting CPCB discharge standards (TDS = 79 mg/L, COD = 32 mg/L). The integrated approach effectively transformed a high-strength acidic effluent into reusable water while concentrating recoverable metal residues. A preliminary techno-economic assessment indicated that the process is technically viable and scalable, with energy consumption during distillation being the major cost factor. The study demonstrates a sustainable and resource-efficient treatment pathway for LIB recycling effluents, contributing toward circular economy and zero-liquid discharge objectives.
| Published in | International Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy (Volume 10, Issue 4) | 
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15 | 
| Page(s) | 143-159 | 
| Creative Commons | 
 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. | 
| Copyright | Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group | 
Effluent Treatment, LIBs Recycling, Coagulation, Adsorption, Distillation
| [1] | Vaccari M, Parlanti F, M. Manni F, Orefice M, Mathieux F, Pannocchia G, Tognotti L, Bertei A, Assessing performance in lithium-ion batteries recycling processes: A quantitative modeling perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2024, 206, 107643. | 
| [2] | Zheng X, Zhu Z, Lin X, Zhang Y, He Y, Cao H, Sun Z, A Mini-Review on Metal Recycling from Spent Lithium Ion Batteries. Engineer. 2018, 4, 361–370. | 
| [3] | Li L, Zhang X, Li M, Chen R, Wu F, Amine K, Lu J, The Recycling of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries: a Review of Current Processes and Technologies. Electrochem Energy Rev. 2018, 1, 461–482. | 
| [4] | Masias A, Marcicki J, Paxton W, Opportunities and Challenges of Lithium Ion Batteries in Automotive Applications. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 621–630. | 
| [5] | Alves B, Global waste generation Retrieved from Statista (2023) https://www.statista.com/topics/4983/waste-generation-worldwide/#editorsPicks | 
| [6] | Lithium-ion battery cell demand worldwide in 2022, with a forecast to 2030: Statista (2024) https://www.statista.com/statistics/1419502/global-lithium-ion-battery-demand-forecast/ | 
| [7] | Amusa, H. K., Sadiq, M., Alam, G. et al. Electric vehicle batteries waste management and recycling challenges: a comprehensive review of green technologies and future prospects. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2024, 26, 1959–1978. | 
| [8] | Ahmed S, Haleem N, Jamal Y, Khan S J, Yang X, Recovery of lithium and cobalt from used lithium‑ion cell phone batteries through a pyro‑hydrometallurgical hybrid extraction process and chemical precipitation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage. 2025, 27, 925–936. | 
| [9] | Bahgat M, Farghaly E, Basir M, Fouad A, Synthesis, characterization and magnetic properties of microcrystalline lithium cobalt ferrite from spent lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Process Technol 2007, 183, 117–121. | 
| [10] | Fouad O. A, Farghaly F. I, Bahgat M. A. Novel approach for the synthesis of nanocrystalline g-LiAlO2 from spent lithium-ion batteries. Journal of analytical and applied pyrolysis. 2007, 78, 65–69. | 
| [11] | Windisch-Kern S, Gerold E, Nigl T, Jandric A, Altendorfer M, Rutrecht B, Scherhaufer S, Raupenstrauch H, Pomberger R, Antrekowitsch H, Part F, Recycling chains for lithium-ion batteries: A critical examination of current challenges, opportunities, and process dependencies. Waste Mgmt. 2022, 138, 125–139. | 
| [12] | Xiao J, Li J, Xu Z, Recycling Metals from Lithium Ion Battery by Mechanical Separation and Vacuum Metallurgy. J Hazard Mater. 2017, 338, 124–131. | 
| [13] | Chagnes A, Pospiech B, A brief review on hydrometallurgical technologies for recycling spent lithium-ion batteries. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 1191–1199. | 
| [14] | Sriramoju S, Dash P, Majumdar S, Meso-porous Activated Carbon from Lignite Waste and its Application in Methylene Blue Adsorption and Coke Plant Effluent Treatment. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021, 9, 104784. | 
| [15] | Guillossou R, Roux J, Mailler R, Pereira-Derome C, Varrault G, Bressy A, Vulliet E, Morlay C, Nauleau F, Rocher V, Gasperi J, Influence of dissolved organic matter on the removal of 12 organic micropollutants from wastewater effluent by powdered activated carbon adsorption. Water Res. 2020, 172, 115487. | 
| [16] | Topare N, Bokil S, Adsorption of textile industry effluent in a fixed bed column using activated carbon prepared from agro-waste materials. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021, 43, 530–534. | 
| [17] | Getahun M, Befekadu A, Alemayehu E, Coagulation process for the removal of color and turbidity from wet coffee processing industry wastewater using bio-coagulant: Optimization through central composite design. Heliyon. 2024, 10, e27584. | 
| [18] | Ait-Hmanea A, Mandi L, Ouazzani N, Ouhammou M, El Moussaoui T, Ait hammou H, Assabbane A, Treatment of olive mill wastewater by coagulation-flocculation with aluminum sulfate/aluminum polyhydroxichlorosulfate and effect on phytotoxicity. Desal Water Treat. 2024, 318, 100340. | 
| [19] | Iloamaeke I, Nnaji N, Okpala E, N. Eboatu A, Onuegbu T, Mercenaria shell: Coagulation-flocculation studies on color removal by response surface methodology and nephelometric kinetics of an industrial effluent. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020, 9, 105715. | 
| [20] | Bratby J, Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment (3rd ed., Vol. 15). IWA Publishing. 2016, | 
| [21] | Nnaji P, Okolo B, Menkiti M, Nephelometric Performance Evaluation of Oxidized Starch in the Treatment of Coal Washery Effluent. Nat Res. 2014, 5, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/nr.2014.53009 | 
| [22] | Ma J, Li G, Chen Z, Xu G, Cai G, Enhanced coagulation of surface waters with high organic content by permanganate pre oxidation. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply. 2001, 1, 51–61. | 
| [23] | Walsh M, Zhao N, Gora S, Gagnon G, Effect of coagulation and flocculation conditions on water quality in an immersed ultrafiltration process. Environ. Technol. 2009, 30, 927–938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330902971287 | 
| [24] | Fendri I, Khannous L, Timoumi A, Gharsallah N, Gdoura R, Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for printing ink industrial wastewater treatment using response surface methodology. Afr. J Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 4819–4826. | 
| [25] | Poleneni S, Innis E, Shi H, Yang J, Hua B, Clamp J, Enhanced Flocculation Using Drinking Water Treatment Plant Sedimentation Residual Solids. Water. 2019, 11, 1821. | 
| [26] | Kårelid V, Larsson G, Bjorlenius B, Pilot-scale removal of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater: Comparison of granular and powdered activated carbon treatment at three wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Manage. 2017, 193, 491–502. | 
| [27] | Mailler R, Gasperi J, Coquet Y, Deshayes S, Zedek S, Cren-Olivé C, Cartiser N, Eudes V, Bressy A, Caupos E, Moilleron R, Chebbo G, Rocher V, Study of a large scale powdered activated carbon pilot: Removals of a wide range of emerging and priority micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res. 2015, 72, 315–330. | 
| [28] | Cui G, Bi M, Liu C, Design and experimental validation of a six-effect multi-effect evaporation plant utilized in oilfield. Desal Water Treat. 2021, 217, 111–126. | 
| [29] | Yang D, Yin Y, Wang Z, Zhu B, Gu Q, Multi-Effect Evaporation Coupled with MVR Heat Pump Thermal Integration Distillation for Separating Salt Containing Methanol wastewater. Energy Power Eng. 2017, 9(12), 772–785. | 
| [30] | Mugaishudeen G, Manikandan A, Kannan T, Experimental study of Triple Effect Forced Circulation Evaporator at Perundurai Common Effluent Treatment Plant. J Acad Ind Res. 2013, 1(12), 753–757. | 
| [31] | Kim D, A review of desalting process techniques and economic analysis of the recovery of salts from retenates. Desal. 2011, 270, 1–8. | 
| [32] | Reddy S, Karnena M, Dwarapureddi B, Saritha V, Treatment of Effluents Containing High Total Dissolved Solids By Multi-Effect Evaporator. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2020, 19, 1173–1177. | 
| [33] | Nataraj S K, Hosamani K M, Aminabhavi T M, Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes. Water Research. 2006, 40, 2349-2356, | 
| [34] | Meshram S, Thakur C, Soni Anupam B, Fixed bed adsorption treatment of effluent of battery recycling unit to remove Pb(II) using steam-activated granular carbon. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2020, 85, 953-965. | 
| [35] | Nayl A E A, Elkhashab R A, El Malah, T. et al. Adsorption studies on the removal of COD and BOD from treated sewage using activated carbon prepared from date palm waste. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2017, 24, 22284–22293. | 
| [36] | Barnwal A, Balakrishna M, Bais P, Nair SRK, Ravendran R, Kaushal A. (2023). Effective methodology for selective recovery of lithium values from discarded Li-ion batteries. JOM 7, 1119–1127. | 
| [37] | Saleem S, Rao K, Barnwal A, Kaushal A, Talari M, Kumar R, Ratheesh R (2024) Recovery of Co-rich metal alloy from end-of-life Li-ion batteries. Materials Today: Proceedings. 112, 99–105. | 
| [38] | Nair, SRK., Kaushal, A., Barnwal, A., Chatterjee S., Ravendran, R., Method For Recovery of Metals and Metal Alloys from Waste Lithium-Ion Batteries. US Patent, US2024/0002978 A1. 2024 https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=2024002978A1&KC=A1&FT=D | 
| [39] | Kaushal, A., Barnwal, A., Nair, SRK, Chatterjee S., Ravendran, R., Method For Recovery of Metal Oxides/Carbonates from Assorted Waste Li-Ion Batteries. US Patent, US23/000298 A1. 2023 https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=2023391632A1&KC=A1&FT=D | 
| [40] | APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. | 
| [41] | CPCB, General standards for discharge of environmental pollutants Part A: Pollutants. The Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, Schedule –VI, pp 545–560. | 
| [42] | Song Y, Dong B, Gao N, Deng Y, Comparative Evaluation of Aluminum Sulfate and Ferric Sulfate Induced Coagulation as Pretreatment of Microfiltration for Treatment of Surface Water. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015, 12, 6700–6709. | 
| [43] | Tahraoui H, Toumi S, Boudoukhani M, Touzout N, Sid A, Amrane A, Belhadj A, Hadjadj M, Laichi Y, Aboumustapha M, Kebir M, Bouguettoucha A, Chebli D, Assadi A, Zhang J, Evaluating the Effectiveness of Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment Using Aluminum Sulfate on a Polluted Surface Water Source: A Year-Long Study. Water. 2024, 16, 400. | 
| [44] | Jesus J, Medeiros D, Esquerre K, Sahin O, Araujo W, Water Treatment with Aluminum Sulfate and Tanin-Based Biocoagulant in an Oil Refinery: The Technical, Environmental, and Economic Performance. Sustainability. 2024, 16, 1191. | 
| [45] | Malik Q, Performance of alum and assorted coagulants in turbidity removal of muddy water. Applied Water Science 2018, 8, 40 | 
| [46] | Farasat Z, Panahi R, Mokhtarani B, Timecourse study of coagulation-flocculation process using aluminum sulfate. Water Conservation and Management. 2017, 1, 07–09. | 
| [47] | Benalia M, Youcef L, Bouaziz1 M, Achour S, Menasra H, Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater by Chemical Precipitation: Mechanisms and Sludge Characterization. Arab J Sci Eng. 2021, 47, 5587–5599. | 
| [48] | Sulistyo H, Rahayu S, Sediawan W, Sarto, Yusuf, Nainggolan R, Water Treatment by Coagulation-Flocculation Using Ferric Sulphate as Coagulant. ASEAN J Chem Eng. 2012, 12, 42–50. | 
| [49] | Nicomel N, Leus K, Folens K, Voort P, Laing G, Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Water: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015, 13, 62. | 
| [50] | Cui H, Huang X, Yu Z, Chen P, Cao X, Application progress of enhanced coagulation in water treatment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 20231–20244. | 
| [51] | Burton F, Tsuchihasi R, Tchobanoglous G, Stensel H D, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery. 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education. 2013. | 
| [52] | Chuan C, Yu G, Hua X, Ying F, Xin L, Effects of pH on coagulation behavior and floc properties in Yellow River water treatment using ferric based coagulants. Chin Sci Bull. 2010, 55, 1382−1387. | 
| [53] | Duan J, Gregory J, Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2003, 100–102, 475–502. | 
| [54] | Rusydi A, Correlation between conductivity and total dissolved solid in various type of water: A review. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2017, 118, 012019. | 
| [55] | Raji Z, Karim A, Karam A, Khallouf S, Adsorption of Heavy Metals: Mechanisms, Kinetics, and Applications of Various Adsorbents in Wastewater Remediation—A Review. Waste. 2023, 1, 775–805. | 
| [56] | Patel H, Fixed‑bed column adsorption study: a comprehensive review. Appl Water Sci. 2019, 9, 45. | 
| [57] | Babel S, & Kurniawan T A, Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2003, 97(1-3), 219-243. | 
| [58] | Patel H, Comparison of batch and fixed bed column adsorption: a critical review. IJEST 2021, 19, 10409–10426. | 
| [59] | Mohan D, Pittman Charles U, Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007, 142, 1-53 | 
| [60] | Haaz, E., Fozer, D., Nagy, T. et al. Vacuum evaporation and reverse osmosis treatment of process wastewaters containing surfactant material: COD reduction and water reuse. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2019, 21, 861–870. | 
APA Style
Purohit, D., Ramaswamy, K., Kumar, A. S., Bais, P., Ravendran, R., et al. (2025). Effective Treatment of Acidic Effluent Generated from Li-ion Battery Recycling. International Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 10(4), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15
ACS Style
Purohit, D.; Ramaswamy, K.; Kumar, A. S.; Bais, P.; Ravendran, R., et al. Effective Treatment of Acidic Effluent Generated from Li-ion Battery Recycling. Int. J. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2025, 10(4), 143-159. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15,
  author = {Dhvani Purohit and Kadari Ramaswamy and Anoop Satheesh Kumar and Priyadarshini Bais and Ratheesh Ravendran and Ajay Kaushal},
  title = {Effective Treatment of Acidic Effluent Generated from Li-ion Battery Recycling
},
  journal = {International Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {143-159},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmpem.20251004.15},
  abstract = {The present study investigates a comprehensive treatment strategy for managing acidic effluent generated during the hydrometallurgical processing of discarded lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), specifically following cobalt oxalate precipitation. The effluent, characterized by extremely low pH (0.1), high total dissolved solids (TDS = 50,000 mg/L), and elevated chemical oxygen demand (COD = 1640 mg/L), was treated through a sequential combination of coagulation, adsorption, and distillation. Coagulation using ferric sulfate achieved 34% TDS reduction through precipitation of dissolved metal ions and oxalates. Subsequent adsorption employing thermally activated carbon derived from waste RO filters further reduced TDS by ~55% due to enhanced surface area and porous structure. Final distillation at 150°C yielded a >99% decrease in TDS and COD, producing condensate meeting CPCB discharge standards (TDS = 79 mg/L, COD = 32 mg/L). The integrated approach effectively transformed a high-strength acidic effluent into reusable water while concentrating recoverable metal residues. A preliminary techno-economic assessment indicated that the process is technically viable and scalable, with energy consumption during distillation being the major cost factor. The study demonstrates a sustainable and resource-efficient treatment pathway for LIB recycling effluents, contributing toward circular economy and zero-liquid discharge objectives.
},
 year = {2025}
}
											
										TY - JOUR T1 - Effective Treatment of Acidic Effluent Generated from Li-ion Battery Recycling AU - Dhvani Purohit AU - Kadari Ramaswamy AU - Anoop Satheesh Kumar AU - Priyadarshini Bais AU - Ratheesh Ravendran AU - Ajay Kaushal Y1 - 2025/10/30 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15 T2 - International Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy JF - International Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy JO - International Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy SP - 143 EP - 159 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1859 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmpem.20251004.15 AB - The present study investigates a comprehensive treatment strategy for managing acidic effluent generated during the hydrometallurgical processing of discarded lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), specifically following cobalt oxalate precipitation. The effluent, characterized by extremely low pH (0.1), high total dissolved solids (TDS = 50,000 mg/L), and elevated chemical oxygen demand (COD = 1640 mg/L), was treated through a sequential combination of coagulation, adsorption, and distillation. Coagulation using ferric sulfate achieved 34% TDS reduction through precipitation of dissolved metal ions and oxalates. Subsequent adsorption employing thermally activated carbon derived from waste RO filters further reduced TDS by ~55% due to enhanced surface area and porous structure. Final distillation at 150°C yielded a >99% decrease in TDS and COD, producing condensate meeting CPCB discharge standards (TDS = 79 mg/L, COD = 32 mg/L). The integrated approach effectively transformed a high-strength acidic effluent into reusable water while concentrating recoverable metal residues. A preliminary techno-economic assessment indicated that the process is technically viable and scalable, with energy consumption during distillation being the major cost factor. The study demonstrates a sustainable and resource-efficient treatment pathway for LIB recycling effluents, contributing toward circular economy and zero-liquid discharge objectives. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -