Having reviewed previous empirical studies on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth, limited attention was given on the role of exchange rate on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth. Therefore this study investigates the role of exchange rate on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth over the period 1986 to 2018 using annual time series data sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Augmented Dicker-fuller Unit Root Test and ARDL model were used for the analyses. The ARDL Bounds test to cointegration revealed that economic growth, foreign direct investment, export, import and exchange rate do not have long run relationship over the period under study. The results showed that foreign direct investment has positive relationship with economic growth at maximum, average and minimum level of exchange rate but the relationship is only significant at maximum level over the period under study. This means that at maximum level of exchange rate, an increase in foreign direct investment will lead to a risein economic growth. The results also showed that export has significant positive relationship with economic growth meaning that an increase in export will lead to a rise in economic growth while import showed insignificant negative relationship with economic growth. Based on the results, the study recommended that further depreciation of Nigeria’s currency should be encourage so as to allow more inflow of foreign direct investment considering its positive impact on economic growth while the Nigerian Government is encouraged to design and implement policies that will spur export by eliminating stringent excise duties and discouraging import which exerts negative influence on economic growth.
Published in | Journal of Investment and Management (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13 |
Page(s) | 13-21 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Economic Growth, Exchange Rate, Foreign Direct Investment
[1] | Adegboye, C. Ogbebor, O. and Egharyba, I. (2014). External capital flows and economic growth in Nigeria. JORIND, 12 (2), 91-98. |
[2] | Adeleke, M., Olowe O. and Fasesin O. (2014). Impact of foreign direct investment on Nigeria economic growth. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 8. Pp 234-242. |
[3] | Adeolu A. (2007). FDI and economic growth: evidence from Nigeria. Nairobi: AERC Research Paper 165African Economic Research Consortium. Pp 1-42. |
[4] | Adigwe, K., Ezeagba, E., and Francis U. (2015). Effect of foreign direct investment on Nigerian economic growth. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Management Sciences. Vol. 3 No. 5, 2015 IS. Pp 28-34. |
[5] | Alege, O. and Ogundipe A. (2013). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in ECOWAS. a system-GMM approach. Covenant Journal of Business and Social Sciences (CJBSS), Pp 5 (1), 1-22. |
[6] | Alexander, A., Joshua G. and Tauhid S. (2013). Estimating the impact of foreign direct investment in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 17. Pp 138-145. |
[7] | Aminu, Y., U. and Batat, E., H,. N. (2019). Has foreign aid accelerated economic growth? Evidence from Nigeria. Northwest Journal of Social and Management Scineces. Vol. 2 Issue No. 1. |
[8] | Ansarul, H., Ashok P. and Syeda H. (2017). Foreign direct investment and growth- a study in the context of Kuwait. International Journal of Financial Research. Pp 9-15. |
[9] | Bakare, A., Tunde A. and Bashorun T. (2014). The two gap model and the Nigerian economy; Bridging the gaps with foreign direct investment. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention Pp 1-14. |
[10] | Benedict, A. and John C. (2017). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. European Journal of Research in Social Sciences. Vol. 5 No. 1. Pp 11-20. |
[11] | Brambor, T., Clark, R and Golder, M. (2005): Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Winter 2006), pp. 63-82. |
[12] | Cockcraft L. & Ridell C. (1991): “Foreign Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa”, World Bank Working Papers, No. 61 IMF (1977). |
[13] | Easterly, P. (2006). The realities of foreign aid to third world countries. London: Keagan Paul. |
[14] | Edward, M. (2014). Foreign direct investment and Rwanda’s economic performance. European Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 6, No. 17, Pp 60-69. |
[15] | Egwaikhide, I (2012). The impact of foreign direct investment on Nigeria’s economic growth: Evidence from the Johansen cointegration approach. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Pp 122-134. |
[16] | Fredrick, A. and Manasseh O. (2014). The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF) Volume 3, Issue 5. PP 37-45. |
[17] | Goldberg, S. L. (2006). Exchange rates and foreign direct investment. World Investment Report (United Nations). |
[18] | Ikeanyibe, M. (2009). Development planning in Nigeria: reflections on the national economic empowerment and strategy (NEEDS) 2003-2007. J socsc 20 (3): 197-210. |
[19] | Jhingan, L. (2012). “The economics of development and planning” (40thed.) Delhi: Vrinda Publications (p) Ltd. |
[20] | Lily, J., Kogid, M., Mulok, D., Sang, T. L., and Asid, R. (2014). Exchange rates movement and foreign direct investment in Asean economies. Economics Research International. Vol. 2014, Article 320949. Pp 1-10. |
[21] | Murphy, K, Schleifer, A, and Vishny, W. (1989). Industrialization and the Big Push. Journal of Political Economy 97 _5, 1003–1026. |
[22] | National Bureau of statistics (2018). Nigerian capital importation. Retrieved from www.nigerianstat.gov.ng. |
[23] | National Planning Commission (2005). National economic empowerment and development strategy (NEEDS). (Abridged document). |
[24] | National Planning Commission (2017). Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) Document. |
[25] | Onyali, I. and Okafor, T. (2014). Foreign direct investment and the Nigerian economy: Vision 2020 mission. Journal of Business and Finance management Research. Pp 8-16. |
[26] | Pesaran, H, Shin Y. & Smith, J. (2001): Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326. |
[27] | Organization for Economic Corporation and Development (OECD) (2018). Foreign direct investment statistics. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/investment/statistics.htm. |
APA Style
Nya’akunat Elisha-Hosea Batat, Ezekiel Ahmadu. (2021). Nexus Between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: The Role of Exchange Rate. Journal of Investment and Management, 10(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13
ACS Style
Nya’akunat Elisha-Hosea Batat; Ezekiel Ahmadu. Nexus Between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: The Role of Exchange Rate. J. Invest. Manag. 2021, 10(1), 13-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13
AMA Style
Nya’akunat Elisha-Hosea Batat, Ezekiel Ahmadu. Nexus Between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: The Role of Exchange Rate. J Invest Manag. 2021;10(1):13-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13
@article{10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13, author = {Nya’akunat Elisha-Hosea Batat and Ezekiel Ahmadu}, title = {Nexus Between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: The Role of Exchange Rate}, journal = {Journal of Investment and Management}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, pages = {13-21}, doi = {10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jim.20211001.13}, abstract = {Having reviewed previous empirical studies on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth, limited attention was given on the role of exchange rate on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth. Therefore this study investigates the role of exchange rate on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth over the period 1986 to 2018 using annual time series data sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Augmented Dicker-fuller Unit Root Test and ARDL model were used for the analyses. The ARDL Bounds test to cointegration revealed that economic growth, foreign direct investment, export, import and exchange rate do not have long run relationship over the period under study. The results showed that foreign direct investment has positive relationship with economic growth at maximum, average and minimum level of exchange rate but the relationship is only significant at maximum level over the period under study. This means that at maximum level of exchange rate, an increase in foreign direct investment will lead to a risein economic growth. The results also showed that export has significant positive relationship with economic growth meaning that an increase in export will lead to a rise in economic growth while import showed insignificant negative relationship with economic growth. Based on the results, the study recommended that further depreciation of Nigeria’s currency should be encourage so as to allow more inflow of foreign direct investment considering its positive impact on economic growth while the Nigerian Government is encouraged to design and implement policies that will spur export by eliminating stringent excise duties and discouraging import which exerts negative influence on economic growth.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Nexus Between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: The Role of Exchange Rate AU - Nya’akunat Elisha-Hosea Batat AU - Ezekiel Ahmadu Y1 - 2021/04/23 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13 T2 - Journal of Investment and Management JF - Journal of Investment and Management JO - Journal of Investment and Management SP - 13 EP - 21 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7721 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20211001.13 AB - Having reviewed previous empirical studies on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth, limited attention was given on the role of exchange rate on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth. Therefore this study investigates the role of exchange rate on the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth over the period 1986 to 2018 using annual time series data sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Augmented Dicker-fuller Unit Root Test and ARDL model were used for the analyses. The ARDL Bounds test to cointegration revealed that economic growth, foreign direct investment, export, import and exchange rate do not have long run relationship over the period under study. The results showed that foreign direct investment has positive relationship with economic growth at maximum, average and minimum level of exchange rate but the relationship is only significant at maximum level over the period under study. This means that at maximum level of exchange rate, an increase in foreign direct investment will lead to a risein economic growth. The results also showed that export has significant positive relationship with economic growth meaning that an increase in export will lead to a rise in economic growth while import showed insignificant negative relationship with economic growth. Based on the results, the study recommended that further depreciation of Nigeria’s currency should be encourage so as to allow more inflow of foreign direct investment considering its positive impact on economic growth while the Nigerian Government is encouraged to design and implement policies that will spur export by eliminating stringent excise duties and discouraging import which exerts negative influence on economic growth. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -