Performance of Barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare </i>L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics

Tariku Tefera; Hailu Hameso; Hailu Tontosha

doi:doi:10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics

Tariku Tefera, Hailu Hameso, Hailu Tontosha

Published in Plant (Volume 10, Issue 3)

Received: 20 August 2022 Accepted: 8 September 2022 Published: 21 September 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In the increasing population, there is a growing need to improve crop productivity. The aim of this study was to increase yield and yield components of barley production using organic and inorganic fertilizer in Bensa district. The experiment was laid out in Randomize Complete Block Design with factorial arrangement with three replication total twelve treatments. The treatments in the experiment were two levels of varieties (HB-1307 and EH-1493), and six level of organic and inorganic fertilizer (control, 100% NPS, 100% FYM, 50:50% NPS: FYM, 66.6: 33.3% NPS: FYM, and 33.3: 66.6% NPS: FYM. The analysis of data revealed significant difference due varieties and organic and inorganic fertilizer on phenological and growth parameters of barley significantly (P<0.001) affected. The results of this study indicated that organic and inorganic fertilizer significantly improved yield and yield components of barley. Higher biomass yield (10.45 ton ha^-1) and grain yield (7.1ton ha^-1) of barley were obtained from application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM. The highest marginal rate of return (MRR%) 545.5 was obtained from 66.6% NPS; 33.3% FYM. Given the fact that yield performance between the organic and inorganic fertilizer combination, application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM was recommended for optimum grain yield and economical profitable barley production in Bensa Daye district, Sidama Region, Ethiopia.

Published in	Plant (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
Page(s)	81-88
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Barley Varieties, Inorganic Fertilizers, Organic Fertilizers, Soil Acidity

References

[1]	Voltas, J., Romagosa, I., Lafarga, A., Armesto, A. P., Sombrero, A. and Araus, J. L. 1998. Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50: 1263–1271.
[2]	Saisho, D. and Purugganan, M. D. 2007. Molecular phylogeography of domesticated barley traces expansion ofagriculture in the Old World. Genetics. 177: 1765-1776.
[3]	USDA (United States Department of Agriculture).. World Agricultural Production U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service / Office of Global Analysis International Production Assessment Division (IPAD) Ag Box 1051, Room 4630, South Building Washington, DC 20250-10512017.
[4]	Muluken bantayehu, 2013. Study on malting barley genotypes under diverse agro ecologies of north western Ethiopia: Adet agricultural research center, p. O. Box 08, Bahirdar, Ethiopia.
[5]	CSA (Central Statistical Agency). Central Statistical Agency agricultural sample survey report on area and production of major crops private peasant holdings, meher season. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Volume I. 2018.
[6]	Mulatu, B. & Grando, S. 2011. Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28-30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria. pp xiv + 391.
[7]	Getaneh W. 2007. The barley leaf rust in the high land of Ethiopia: Significance, virulence spectrum and sources of partial resistance. PhD Dissertation, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[8]	T. A and D. Tanner. Effect of fertilizer application on N and P uptake, recovery and use efficiency of bread wheat grown on two soil types in central Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources. 3 (2): 219-244. and N and Pfertilizers in acidic soils 2001.
[9]	Wassie H and Shiferaw B. 2011. Response of Irish potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) to the application of potassium at acidic soils of Chencha, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Biol, 13: 595–598.
[10]	Vanlauwe, B., J. Wendt and J. Diels, 2001. Combined application of organic matter andfertilizer. pp 247-280. In: Tian, G. F. Ishida and J. D. H. Keating (eds.) Sustaining soilfertility in West Africa. SSSA Special Publication, No. 58. Soil Science Society ofAmerica. Madison, USA.
[11]	M. S, Black, R., Jayne, T. S. Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for input intensification strategies and research. Food Policy. 41, 39-52.2013.
[12]	MoA (Ministry of Agriculture) Ministry of Agriculture. Animal and Plant Health Regulatory Directorate. Crop variety register, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2012.
[13]	Abera T, Molla A, Feyissa A, Liben M, Woyema A, et al. (2011) Research achievements in barley cultural practices in Ethiopia. Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia, p: 113.
[14]	Cairns JE, Hellin J, Sonder K, Araus JL, MacRobert JF, Thierfelder 2013. Adapting maize production to climate change in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Secur.; 5 (3): 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0256-x
[15]	Zougmore RB, Partey ST, Oue´draogo M, Torquebiau E, Campbell BM. 2018. Facing climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa: analysis of climate-smart agriculture opportunities to manage climate-related risks. Cah Agric.; 27 (3): 34001 https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018019
[16]	M. L. Jackson, Soil Chemical Analysis, practice Hall of India, New Delhi, India, 1958.
[17]	A. Walkley and C. A. Black, “An examination of different methods for determining soil organic matter and the proposed modification by the chromic acid titration method,” Soil Science, vol. 37, pp. 29–38, 1934.
[18]	Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F., Dean, L 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939, US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C..
[19]	FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) Plant Nutrition for Food Security. A Guide for Integrated Nutrient Management. Rome, Italy 2008.
[20]	Eghball B, D. Ginting and J. E. Gilley, 2004. Residual effects of manure and compostapplications on corn production and soil properties. Agronomy Journal. 96: 442-447.
[21]	P S. K., T. S. Verma, and J. P. Gupta. Ameliorating effects of phosphorus, limeand animal manure on wheat yield and root cation exchange capacity in degradedAlfisols of North- West Himalayas. Fertilizer Research 23: 7-131990.
[22]	Ofosu-Anim J, Leitch M (2009) Relative efficiency of organic manures inspring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) production. Australian Journal of Crop Science 3: 13-19.
[23]	Abdur R, Khan RU (2008) Comparative effect of varieties and fertilizerlevels on barley (Hordeum vulgare). International Journal of Agricultureand Biology 10: 124-126.
[24]	Alemu D, Kelemu K, Lakew B (2014) Trends and prospects of malt barleyvalue chains in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[25]	Tariku B. Tolera A. and Ermiyias H. 2018. Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Variety in Toke Kutaye District, West Showa Zone, Ethiopia. Advanced Crop Science Technology; 6: 365.
[26]	Jan A, Noor M (2007) Response of wheat to farm yard manure andnitrogen under rain-fed conditions. African J Crop Sci 8: 37-40.
[27]	Haris. PB the effect of different rates and times of application of nitrogen on the yield and quality of whole crop barley. Experimental Husbandry 28: 1-6 1995.
[28]	Wubshet M. Temedo T. Singh, T. N. and Teferi M., (2014) “Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and yield components of barley (Hordium vulgare L.) in Keffa Zone, South western Ethiopia,” Science Technology Arts Research Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 34–42, 2014.
[29]	M. CP, Alagundagi SC, SalakinkopSRProductivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes to integrated nutrient management andbroad bed and furrow method of cultivation in watershedarea. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 7: 497-501. 2015.
[30]	Shekhawat PS, Shaktawat RPS, Rathore DS (2013) Effect of nitrogen and potassium levels on growth and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in loamy sand soil of Rajasthan. Environment and Ecology 31: 1303-130.
[31]	Woldesenbet M, Tana T (2014). Effect of Integrated Nutrient Managementon Yield and Yield Components of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Kafa Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal 3: 34-42.
[32]	P. P, Slafer GA, SavinRLeaf appearance, tillering and theircoordination in response to NxP fertilization in barley. Plant and Soil 255: 587-5942003.
[33]	Arif M, Ali S, Khan A, Jan T, Akbar M (2006) inﬂuence of farm yardmanure application on various wheat cultivars. Sarhad Journal ofAgriculture 22: 27.
[34]	R. N. Sepat, R. K. Rai, and S. Dhar, “Planting systems andintegrated nutrient management for enhanced wheat (Triticumaestivum) productivity,” Indian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 114–118, 2010.
[35]	A. S. Godara, U. S. Gupta, and R. Singh, “Effect of integrated nutrient management on herbage, dry fodder yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.),” Forage Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 59–61, 2012.
[36]	Saidu A, Ole K, Leye BO (2012) Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as inﬂuenced by complementary use of organic and inorganic fertilizers. International Journal of Science and Nature 5: 532-537.
[37]	Ram H, Neha G, Balwinder K, Baljit S (2014) Progressive Res 9: 44-49. Prystupa P, Slafer GA, Savin R (2003) Leaf appearance, tillering and their coordination in response to NxP fertilization in barley. Plant and Soil 255: 587-594.
[38]	Shata SM, Mahmoud SA, Siam HS (2007) Improving calcareous soil productivity by integrated eوٴect of intercropping and fertilizer. Res J AgrBiolSci 3: 733-739.
[39]	Farah GA, Dagash YMI, Yagoob SO (2014) Effect of Different Fertilizers (Bio, Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers) on Some Yield Components ofRice (Oryza Sativa L.). Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 67-70.
[40]	Berecz K, Kismányoky T, Debreczeni K (2005) Effect of organic matter recycling in longterm fertilization trials and model potexperiments. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36: 191-202.
[41]	Parihar CM, Rana KS, Kantwa SR (2010). Nutrient management in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)—Mustard (Brassica juncea) croppingsystem as affected by land configuration under limited irrigation. IndianJournal of Agronomy 55: 191.
[42]	Bekele T, Ashagrie Y, Tulema B, Gebrekidan G (1996). Soil fertility management in Barley. In 1. Proceedings of the Barley Research Review Workshop, Addis Abeba (Ethiopia), 16-19 Oct 1993. IAR/ICARDA.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tariku Tefera, Hailu Hameso, Hailu Tontosha. (2022). Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics. Plant, 10(3), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tariku Tefera; Hailu Hameso; Hailu Tontosha. Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics. Plant. 2022, 10(3), 81-88. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tariku Tefera, Hailu Hameso, Hailu Tontosha. Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics. Plant. 2022;10(3):81-88. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14,
  author = {Tariku Tefera and Hailu Hameso and Hailu Tontosha},
  title = {Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics},
  journal = {Plant},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {81-88},
  doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20221003.14},
  abstract = {In the increasing population, there is a growing need to improve crop productivity. The aim of this study was to increase yield and yield components of barley production using organic and inorganic fertilizer in Bensa district. The experiment was laid out in Randomize Complete Block Design with factorial arrangement with three replication total twelve treatments. The treatments in the experiment were two levels of varieties (HB-1307 and EH-1493), and six level of organic and inorganic fertilizer (control, 100% NPS, 100% FYM, 50:50% NPS: FYM, 66.6: 33.3% NPS: FYM, and 33.3: 66.6% NPS: FYM. The analysis of data revealed significant difference due varieties and organic and inorganic fertilizer on phenological and growth parameters of barley significantly (P-1) and grain yield (7.1ton ha-1) of barley were obtained from application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM. The highest marginal rate of return (MRR%) 545.5 was obtained from 66.6% NPS; 33.3% FYM. Given the fact that yield performance between the organic and inorganic fertilizer combination, application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM was recommended for optimum grain yield and economical profitable barley production in Bensa Daye district, Sidama Region, Ethiopia.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics
AU  - Tariku Tefera
AU  - Hailu Hameso
AU  - Hailu Tontosha
Y1  - 2022/09/21
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
T2  - Plant
JF  - Plant
JO  - Plant
SP  - 81
EP  - 88
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
AB  - In the increasing population, there is a growing need to improve crop productivity. The aim of this study was to increase yield and yield components of barley production using organic and inorganic fertilizer in Bensa district. The experiment was laid out in Randomize Complete Block Design with factorial arrangement with three replication total twelve treatments. The treatments in the experiment were two levels of varieties (HB-1307 and EH-1493), and six level of organic and inorganic fertilizer (control, 100% NPS, 100% FYM, 50:50% NPS: FYM, 66.6: 33.3% NPS: FYM, and 33.3: 66.6% NPS: FYM. The analysis of data revealed significant difference due varieties and organic and inorganic fertilizer on phenological and growth parameters of barley significantly (P-1) and grain yield (7.1ton ha-1) of barley were obtained from application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM. The highest marginal rate of return (MRR%) 545.5 was obtained from 66.6% NPS; 33.3% FYM. Given the fact that yield performance between the organic and inorganic fertilizer combination, application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM was recommended for optimum grain yield and economical profitable barley production in Bensa Daye district, Sidama Region, Ethiopia.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tariku Tefera

Department of Plant Science, Bensa Daye Campus, Hawassa University, Daye, Ethiopia
Hailu Hameso

Department of Plant Science, Bensa Daye Campus, Hawassa University, Daye, Ethiopia
Hailu Tontosha

Department of Plant Science, Bensa Daye Campus, Hawassa University, Daye, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tariku Tefera, Hailu Hameso, Hailu Tontosha. (2022). Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics. Plant, 10(3), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tariku Tefera; Hailu Hameso; Hailu Tontosha. Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics. Plant. 2022, 10(3), 81-88. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tariku Tefera, Hailu Hameso, Hailu Tontosha. Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics. Plant. 2022;10(3):81-88. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14,
  author = {Tariku Tefera and Hailu Hameso and Hailu Tontosha},
  title = {Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics},
  journal = {Plant},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {81-88},
  doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20221003.14},
  abstract = {In the increasing population, there is a growing need to improve crop productivity. The aim of this study was to increase yield and yield components of barley production using organic and inorganic fertilizer in Bensa district. The experiment was laid out in Randomize Complete Block Design with factorial arrangement with three replication total twelve treatments. The treatments in the experiment were two levels of varieties (HB-1307 and EH-1493), and six level of organic and inorganic fertilizer (control, 100% NPS, 100% FYM, 50:50% NPS: FYM, 66.6: 33.3% NPS: FYM, and 33.3: 66.6% NPS: FYM. The analysis of data revealed significant difference due varieties and organic and inorganic fertilizer on phenological and growth parameters of barley significantly (P-1) and grain yield (7.1ton ha-1) of barley were obtained from application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM. The highest marginal rate of return (MRR%) 545.5 was obtained from 66.6% NPS; 33.3% FYM. Given the fact that yield performance between the organic and inorganic fertilizer combination, application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM was recommended for optimum grain yield and economical profitable barley production in Bensa Daye district, Sidama Region, Ethiopia.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Performance of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield, Yield Components and Soil Characteristics
AU  - Tariku Tefera
AU  - Hailu Hameso
AU  - Hailu Tontosha
Y1  - 2022/09/21
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
T2  - Plant
JF  - Plant
JO  - Plant
SP  - 81
EP  - 88
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221003.14
AB  - In the increasing population, there is a growing need to improve crop productivity. The aim of this study was to increase yield and yield components of barley production using organic and inorganic fertilizer in Bensa district. The experiment was laid out in Randomize Complete Block Design with factorial arrangement with three replication total twelve treatments. The treatments in the experiment were two levels of varieties (HB-1307 and EH-1493), and six level of organic and inorganic fertilizer (control, 100% NPS, 100% FYM, 50:50% NPS: FYM, 66.6: 33.3% NPS: FYM, and 33.3: 66.6% NPS: FYM. The analysis of data revealed significant difference due varieties and organic and inorganic fertilizer on phenological and growth parameters of barley significantly (P-1) and grain yield (7.1ton ha-1) of barley were obtained from application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM. The highest marginal rate of return (MRR%) 545.5 was obtained from 66.6% NPS; 33.3% FYM. Given the fact that yield performance between the organic and inorganic fertilizer combination, application of 66.6:33.3% NPS: FYM was recommended for optimum grain yield and economical profitable barley production in Bensa Daye district, Sidama Region, Ethiopia.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download