| Peer-Reviewed

Therapeutic Efficacy of Albendazole and Tetraclozan Against Gastrointestinal Worms in Crossbred Cows of HARC, Welmera District, Central Ethiopia

Received: 20 October 2021    Accepted: 24 November 2021    Published: 24 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Gastrointestinal parasites are economically important in the dairy industry. A study was carried out to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anthelmintic drugs (Tetraclozan 3400 mg and Albendazole 2500mg) for the treatment of GIT worms in cross-bred cows at Holeta research center. A total of sixty crossbred cows were purposively screened and divided into three groups for the current study. The first groups served as untreated control, the second and third groups were treated with Albendazole and Tetraclozan drugs respectively. Moreover, fecal samples were collected before and after treatment to count the eggs per gram (EPG) of feces and to evaluate drug efficacy percentage. Efficacy for each anthelmintic was determined by the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT). The mean EPG count before and after treatment with Tetraclozan drug on 0. 14th and 21st days was 520±102.1, 100±54.6 and 15±6.7 respectively whereas the mean EPG count on 0, 14th and 21st days before and after treatment with Albendazole drug was 450±127.2, 150±46.2 and 20±6.8 respectively. The overall percentage efficacy of Tetraclozan and Albendazole drugs were 97.11 and 95.5 percent respectively. The study indicated that the two anthelmintic drugs were efficacious against worm infection and thus, leads to reduction in EPG count. It is important to explore the detailed pharmacokinetic and toxic effects of these drugs for wide therapeutic uses in animals. It is also recommended that the clinical responses of GIT helminthes to prophylactic and therapeutic drugs need to be periodically monitored in the farms and further introduced to smallholder farmers.

Published in International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Science (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14
Page(s) 86-90
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anthelmintic, Albendazole, EPG, Therapeutic, Efficacy, Treatment, Tetraclozan

References
[1] Anwar, A. H., Hayat, C. and Amir, M. (1996): Evaluation of anthelmintic in Pakistan Vet. J. 16: 160-163.
[2] Bartley, D. J., Donnan, A. A., Jackson, E., Sargison, N., Jackson, F. (2006): A small scale survey of ivermectin resistance in sheep nematodes using the FECRT on samples collected from Scottish sheep. Veterinary Parasitology, 137, 112-118.
[3] Bogan JA, Kinabo LD, Strong MB, Formica C, Galtier P. (1988): Pharmacokinetics of triclabendazole in Ruminants, Equines and man: In Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the European Association for vet. Pharmacology and toxicology, University of Vet. Science, Budapest, Hungary 159-163.
[4] Chandrawathani, P., Adnan, M., Waller, P. J. (1999): Anthelmintic resistance in sheep and goat farms on Peninsular Malaysia. Veterinary Parasitology. 82: 305-310.
[5] Coles G, Bauer C, Borgsteede M, Geerts S, Klei T, Taylor A, Waller P. (1992): World association for the advancement of Veterinary Parasitology methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol. Pp. 44: 35–44.
[6] Coles, G. C., Jackson, F., Pomroy, W. E., Prichard, R. K., Silvestre, A., Taylor, M. A. (2006): The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet. Parasitol. 136: 167-185.
[7] Demeler J, Van Zeveren AM, Kleinschmidt N, Vercruysse J, Hoglund J. (2009): Monitoring the efficacy of ivermectin and albendazole against gastro intestinal nematodes of cattle in Northern Europe. Vet Parasitol. 160: 109-115.
[8] Gasbarre LC, Smith LL, Lichtenfels J, Pilitt PA. (2014): The identification of cattle nematode parasites resistant to multiple anthelmintics in commercial cattle population in the US. Vet Parasitol. 166: 281-285.
[9] Holzhauer, M., van Schaik, G., Saatkamp, H. W., Ploeger, W. (2011): Lungworm outbreaks in adult dairy cows: estimating economic losses, the veterinary record. 169: 19-49.
[10] Islam, A., Mostafa, M., Awal, M. A. (2003): Recovery rate of GIT worms, Indian Vet. J. 80: 1173-1176.
[11] Keagan JD, Keane OM, Good B, DeWaal T, Denny M, and Fitzgerald W, Sheehan M. (2017): A nation-wide survey of anthelmintic treatment failure on sheep farms in Ireland. Irish Vet J. 70: 7.
[12] Keane OM, Keegan JD, Good B, Casey M, Sheehan M. (2014): High level of treatment failure with anthelmintic on cattle farms. Irish Vet J. 67: 16.
[13] Kumsa B, Debela E, Megersa B. (2010): Comparative efficacy of albendazole, tetramisole and ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes in naturally infected goats in Ziway. J Anim Vet Adv. 9 (23): 2905–11.
[14] Le Jambre, L. F., Gill, J. H. Lenane, I. J. (1995): Characterization of ivermectin resistant strain of Australian Haemonchus contortus. International Journal of Parasitology, 25: 691-698.
[15] Lebbie, S. H. B, Rey, B., Irungu, E. K. (1994): Small ruminant research and Development in Africa. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference of the African shoats Res Network. ILCA, 1-5.
[16] Nari A., Salles, J., Gill, A., Waller, P. J., and Hansen, J. W. (1996): Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep in Southern Latin America: Uruguay, Vet. Parasit, 62: 213-222.
[17] Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD (2006) Veterinary medecine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. Tenth Edition, New York, USA, 2162p.
[18] Rajkhowa, S, Bujarbaruah, Hazarika, G. (2002): EPG counts, Indian J. Vet. Med. 22: 125-126.
[19] Regassa F, Kebede L, Mamo G, Kumsa B, Beyene T. (2013): Efficacy of commonly used anthelmintic drugs in naturally infected ruminants in Central Oromia, Ethiopia. Res J Pharmac. 7 (4): 48–53.
[20] Rose H, Rinaldi L, Bosco A, Charlier J, Hendrickx G, Morgan ER. (2015): Widespread anthelmintic resistance in European farmed ruminants: a systematic review. Vet Rec; 176: 546.
[21] RVC/FAO. 2009. Guide to Veterinary Parasitology.ww.rvc.ac.uk/review/parasitology/RuminantL3 (accessed on October 16, 2009).
[22] Silvestre, A. and Cabaret. (2002): Mutation in gene of Trichostrongylid nematodes, role in benzimidazole resistance, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, 205, 297-300.
[23] Sisay MM, Asefa A, Uggla A, Waller PJ. (2006): Anthelmintic resistance of nematode parasites of small ruminants in Eastern Ethiopia: exploitation to restore anthelmintic efficacy. Vet Parasitol 135: 337-346.
[24] Souls by, E. J. I. (1982): Helminthes, Arthropod and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals, 7th edition. Bailliere, Tindall and Cassell Ltd. pp. 136-346, 365-491 and 763-778.
[25] Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall R. (2007): Vet. Parasitology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Sci. Limited. P. 874.
[26] Urquhart, G. M., J., Armour, J. L, Dunn and Jennings, F. W. (1996): Veterinary parasitology, University of Oxford, Long man scientific. The high and technical press, UK, pp. 100-109.
[27] Waruiru, R. M. (1997): Efficacy of closantel, albendazole and levamisole on ivermectin resistant strain of Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology, 73, 65-71.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Beksisa Urge, Tamirat Seyoum, Temesgen Kassa, Markos Tadele, Fekadu Gutema, et al. (2021). Therapeutic Efficacy of Albendazole and Tetraclozan Against Gastrointestinal Worms in Crossbred Cows of HARC, Welmera District, Central Ethiopia. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Science, 7(4), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Beksisa Urge; Tamirat Seyoum; Temesgen Kassa; Markos Tadele; Fekadu Gutema, et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Albendazole and Tetraclozan Against Gastrointestinal Worms in Crossbred Cows of HARC, Welmera District, Central Ethiopia. Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Clin. Sci. 2021, 7(4), 86-90. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Beksisa Urge, Tamirat Seyoum, Temesgen Kassa, Markos Tadele, Fekadu Gutema, et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Albendazole and Tetraclozan Against Gastrointestinal Worms in Crossbred Cows of HARC, Welmera District, Central Ethiopia. Int J Biomed Eng Clin Sci. 2021;7(4):86-90. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14,
      author = {Beksisa Urge and Tamirat Seyoum and Temesgen Kassa and Markos Tadele and Fekadu Gutema and Neima Arebu and Ulfina Galmessa and Million Tadese},
      title = {Therapeutic Efficacy of Albendazole and Tetraclozan Against Gastrointestinal Worms in Crossbred Cows of HARC, Welmera District, Central Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Science},
      volume = {7},
      number = {4},
      pages = {86-90},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbecs.20210704.14},
      abstract = {Gastrointestinal parasites are economically important in the dairy industry. A study was carried out to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anthelmintic drugs (Tetraclozan 3400 mg and Albendazole 2500mg) for the treatment of GIT worms in cross-bred cows at Holeta research center. A total of sixty crossbred cows were purposively screened and divided into three groups for the current study. The first groups served as untreated control, the second and third groups were treated with Albendazole and Tetraclozan drugs respectively. Moreover, fecal samples were collected before and after treatment to count the eggs per gram (EPG) of feces and to evaluate drug efficacy percentage. Efficacy for each anthelmintic was determined by the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT). The mean EPG count before and after treatment with Tetraclozan drug on 0. 14th and 21st days was 520±102.1, 100±54.6 and 15±6.7 respectively whereas the mean EPG count on 0, 14th and 21st days before and after treatment with Albendazole drug was 450±127.2, 150±46.2 and 20±6.8 respectively. The overall percentage efficacy of Tetraclozan and Albendazole drugs were 97.11 and 95.5 percent respectively. The study indicated that the two anthelmintic drugs were efficacious against worm infection and thus, leads to reduction in EPG count. It is important to explore the detailed pharmacokinetic and toxic effects of these drugs for wide therapeutic uses in animals. It is also recommended that the clinical responses of GIT helminthes to prophylactic and therapeutic drugs need to be periodically monitored in the farms and further introduced to smallholder farmers.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Therapeutic Efficacy of Albendazole and Tetraclozan Against Gastrointestinal Worms in Crossbred Cows of HARC, Welmera District, Central Ethiopia
    AU  - Beksisa Urge
    AU  - Tamirat Seyoum
    AU  - Temesgen Kassa
    AU  - Markos Tadele
    AU  - Fekadu Gutema
    AU  - Neima Arebu
    AU  - Ulfina Galmessa
    AU  - Million Tadese
    Y1  - 2021/11/24
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14
    T2  - International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Science
    JF  - International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Science
    JO  - International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Science
    SP  - 86
    EP  - 90
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-1301
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbecs.20210704.14
    AB  - Gastrointestinal parasites are economically important in the dairy industry. A study was carried out to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anthelmintic drugs (Tetraclozan 3400 mg and Albendazole 2500mg) for the treatment of GIT worms in cross-bred cows at Holeta research center. A total of sixty crossbred cows were purposively screened and divided into three groups for the current study. The first groups served as untreated control, the second and third groups were treated with Albendazole and Tetraclozan drugs respectively. Moreover, fecal samples were collected before and after treatment to count the eggs per gram (EPG) of feces and to evaluate drug efficacy percentage. Efficacy for each anthelmintic was determined by the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT). The mean EPG count before and after treatment with Tetraclozan drug on 0. 14th and 21st days was 520±102.1, 100±54.6 and 15±6.7 respectively whereas the mean EPG count on 0, 14th and 21st days before and after treatment with Albendazole drug was 450±127.2, 150±46.2 and 20±6.8 respectively. The overall percentage efficacy of Tetraclozan and Albendazole drugs were 97.11 and 95.5 percent respectively. The study indicated that the two anthelmintic drugs were efficacious against worm infection and thus, leads to reduction in EPG count. It is important to explore the detailed pharmacokinetic and toxic effects of these drugs for wide therapeutic uses in animals. It is also recommended that the clinical responses of GIT helminthes to prophylactic and therapeutic drugs need to be periodically monitored in the farms and further introduced to smallholder farmers.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia

  • Sections