Browse

Journals By Subject

Life Sciences, Agriculture & Food
Chemistry
Medicine & Health
Materials Science
Mathematics & Physics
Electrical & Computer Science
Earth, Energy & Environment
Architecture & Civil Engineering
Education
Economics & Management
Humanities & Social Sciences
Multidisciplinary

Books

Publish Conference Abstract Books
Upcoming Conference Abstract Books
Published Conference Abstract Books
Publish Your Books
Upcoming Books
Published Books

Proceedings

Events

Events
Five Types of Conference Publications

Join

Join as Editorial Board Member
Become a Reviewer

Information

For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
For Conference Organizers
For Librarians
Article Processing Charges
Special Issue Guidelines
Editorial Process
Manuscript Transfers
Peer Review at SciencePG
Open Access
Copyright and License
Ethical Guidelines
Submit an Article
Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium: A Theoretical Exploration of Price Formation

Tesfay Gebrehiwet Abrha*,  Brhane Tesfay Weldeyohans
Published in International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment (Volume 10, Issue 2)
Received: 10 March 2025     Accepted: 26 March 2025     Published: 19 April 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Download PDF
Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive theoretical and empirical examination of market equilibrium dynamics and price formation mechanisms, analyzing how supply and demand interactions determine prices in both competitive and imperfect markets. Integrating insights from microeconomic theory, game theory, and behavioral economics, the research explores the role of external shocks, market imperfections, and consumer behavior in shaping price dynamics. The study employs the Walrasian general equilibrium model and game-theoretic frameworks to assess market stability, supplemented by empirical case studies on commodity markets, digital economies, and pandemic-induced disruptions. Findings reveal that while competitive markets achieve efficiency through price adjustments, real-world deviations—driven by monopolistic practices, information asymmetries, and behavioral biases often lead to inefficiencies such as price volatility and resource misallocation. External shocks, including geopolitical conflicts (e.g., the Russia-Ukraine war) and health crises (e.g., COVID-19), further disrupt equilibrium, highlighting the vulnerability of global supply chains. The study underscores the limitations of traditional models in capturing behavioral factors like loss aversion and anchoring, which significantly influence consumer decisions and market outcomes. Policy recommendations emphasize the need for resilient supply chain strategies, antitrust enforcement, and behavioral nudges to mitigate distortions. This study blends robust theoretical frameworks with real-world economic data and insights into behavioral patterns to deepen the understanding of price dynamics. It also proposes practical approaches to improve market efficiency in todays globally connected financial landscape.

Published in International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13
Page(s) 46-51
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group
Previous article
Keywords

Market Equilibrium, Price Formation, Supply and Demand, Market Efficiency, Externalities, Behavioral Economy

1. Introduction
Market equilibrium, a fundamental concept in economic theory, represents the point at which supply and demand intersect to determine prices and quantities in a competitive market. The dynamics of price formation are central to understanding how markets allocate resources efficiently. However, real-world markets often deviate from the idealized models of perfect competition due to external shocks, market imperfections, and behavioral factors
[1]
. Recent studies have emphasized the role of information asymmetries, externalities, and consumer psychology in shaping price dynamics
[2, 3]
.
In an increasingly interconnected global economy, understanding the mechanisms of price formation is crucial for policymakers and market participants. External shocks, such as technological advancements, geopolitical events, and pandemics, can disrupt market equilibrium, leading to price volatility and inefficiencies. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruptions to global supply chains, resulting in significant price fluctuations across various sectors
[4]
. Similarly, market imperfections, such as monopolies and oligopolies, distort price signals, while behavioral factors like bounded rationality and cognitive biases influence consumer decision-making
[2]
.
Theoretical models, such as the Walrasian general equilibrium framework, provide a foundational understanding of how markets reach equilibrium through price adjustments
[5]
. However, these models often fail to account for the complexities introduced by external shocks and behavioral factors. Recent advancements in behavioral economics have highlighted the limitations of traditional models, arguing that psychological factors and bounded rationality play a significant role in price determination
[2]
. Additionally, empirical studies have shown how speculation and market sentiment can distort price signals, particularly in commodity markets
[6]
.
This study seeks to bridge the gap between theoretical models and empirical realities by exploring the interplay of supply and demand, market imperfections, and behavioral factors in shaping price dynamics. By integrating insights from microeconomic theory, game theory, and behavioral economics, the research aims to provide a holistic understanding of price formation and its implications for market efficiency. The analysis is contextualized within the evolving global economic landscape, drawing on recent sources such as the World Economic Outlook
[4]
and the Global Financial Stability Report
[7]
.
The primary objectives of this study are:
1) To examine the mechanisms of price formation in competitive and imperfect markets.
2) To analyze the impact of external shocks, market imperfections, and behavioral factors on price dynamics.
3) To provide policy recommendations for enhancing market efficiency and addressing distortions caused by externalities and information asymmetries.
By achieving these objectives, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on market equilibrium and price formation, offering valuable insights for policymakers, economists, and market participants.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Literature
Market dynamics encompass the complex interplay of forces that determine price formation, resource allocation, and trading behavior in economic systems, driven by factors such as technological innovation
[8]
, regulatory changes
[9]
, and behavioral patterns
[10]
. These dynamics manifest through price volatility, market liquidity fluctuations, and evolving competitive landscapes, particularly evident in digital markets where platform economics reshape traditional interactions
[11]
. Market equilibrium dynamics represent the adaptive process by which markets seek balance between supply and demand, incorporating modern challenges like climate-related disruptions
[12]
and algorithmic trading impacts
[13]
. Contemporary research demonstrates how equilibrium concepts must now account for network effects
[14]
, attention economics
[15]
, and the rise of non-traditional market participants like crypto currencies
[16]
, fundamentally altering classical equilibrium assumptions
[17]
. The COVID-19 pandemic particularly revealed the fragility of global equilibrium systems, with Just-in-Time supply chains proving vulnerable to systemic shocks
[18]
.
The study of market equilibrium and price formation has a rich theoretical foundation, dating back to the works of Adam Smith and Alfred Marshall. Smith's concept of the "invisible hand" laid the groundwork for understanding how markets self-regulate through the interaction of supply and demand
[19]
. Marshall's partial equilibrium analysis further refined this understanding by examining how prices are determined in individual markets
[20]
. Modern contributions have expanded on these ideas, incorporating insights from game theory and behavioral economics.
The Walrasian general equilibrium model, developed by Léon Walras, provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how markets reach equilibrium through price adjustments across multiple sectors
[5]
. This model assumes perfect competition, rational behavior, and the absence of externalities, offering a benchmark for analyzing market efficiency. However, real-world markets often deviate from these assumptions due to external shocks, market imperfections, and behavioral factors.
Stiglitz
[1]
emphasized the role of information asymmetries in disrupting market equilibrium, arguing that imperfect information can lead to market failures such as adverse selection and moral hazard. Akerlof's
[3]
seminal work on the "market for lemons" illustrated how information asymmetries can result in the collapse of markets, highlighting the importance of transparency and regulation. Thaler
[2]
introduced behavioral economics into the discourse, challenging the assumption of rational behavior and demonstrating how psychological factors, such as loss aversion and anchoring, influence price dynamics.
Game-theoretic models have also contributed to the understanding of price formation in imperfect markets. These models explore how firms strategically set prices to maximize profits in the presence of competition, particularly in monopolistic and oligopolistic markets
[21]
. For example, the Bertrand and Cournot models provide insights into how firms compete on price and quantity, respectively, in oligopolistic settings. These models highlight the strategic interactions between firms and their impact on market outcomes.
2.2. Empirical Literature
Empirical studies have provided valuable insights into the real-world dynamics of market equilibrium and price formation. The impact of external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, on global supply chains has been extensively documented. According to the World Economic Outlook
[4]
, the pandemic caused significant disruptions to production and distribution networks, leading to unprecedented price volatility in global markets. For instance, the prices of medical supplies, such as personal protective equipment (PPE), surged due to sudden increases in demand and supply constraints
[4]
.
Research on commodity markets has shown how speculation and market sentiment can distort price signals. Fattouh et al.
[6]
examined the role of speculation in oil markets, finding that speculative activities can amplify price fluctuations and lead to inefficiencies. Similarly, studies on agricultural commodities have highlighted the impact of weather shocks and geopolitical events on price volatility
[22]
. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the interplay between supply and demand, as well as external factors, in shaping price dynamics.
Empirical research on monopolistic and oligopolistic markets has demonstrated how firms strategically set prices to maximize profits, often at the expense of market efficiency. For example, studies on the pharmaceutical industry have shown how monopolistic practices, such as patent protection, can lead to high drug prices and limited access to essential medicines
[1]
. Similarly, research on the tech industry has highlighted the market power of dominant firms, such as Google and Amazon, and its impact on competition and innovation
[23]
.
Despite these advances, gaps remain in understanding how external shocks, such as technological disruptions or geopolitical events, impact market equilibrium. For instance, the rapid adoption of digital technologies has transformed traditional markets, creating new challenges for price formation and market regulation
[4]
. Similarly, the ongoing geopolitical tensions, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, have disrupted global energy markets, leading to significant price fluctuations
[4]
.
2.3. Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Literature
The theoretical and empirical literature highlights the complexity of market equilibrium and price formation, emphasizing the interplay between supply and demand, market imperfections, and behavioral factors. While theoretical models provide a foundational understanding of market dynamics, empirical studies reveal the limitations of these models in explaining real-world phenomena. The integration of insights from microeconomic theory, game theory, and behavioral economics offers a more comprehensive framework for analyzing price formation and its implications for market efficiency.
3. Methodology
This study employs a mixed-methods research design, integrating theoretical modeling and empirical analysis to explore the dynamics of market equilibrium and price formation. The methodology is structured to provide a comprehensive understanding of how supply and demand interacts, how external shocks and market imperfections influence price dynamics, and how behavioral factors shape market outcomes.
3.1. Research Design
The research design is divided into three phases:
1) Theoretical Modeling: Develop and analyze theoretical frameworks to understand price formation mechanisms.
2) Empirical Analysis: Use real-world data and case studies to test theoretical models and identify factors influencing market equilibrium.
3) Integration and Synthesis: Combine theoretical and empirical insights to draw conclusions and provide policy recommendations.
3.2. Theoretical Modeling
The theoretical phase focuses on three key models:
1) Walrasian General Equilibrium Model: Used to analyze how prices adjust to balance supply and demand across multiple markets under perfect competition
[5]
.
2) Game-Theoretic Models: Applied to study price formation in imperfect markets, such as monopolies and oligopolies, using the Bertrand and Cournot models
[21]
.
3) Behavioral Economic Models: Incorporate psychological factors, such as bounded rationality and consumer biases, to explain deviations from traditional equilibrium predictions
[2]
.
3.3. Empirical Analysis
The empirical phase involves quantitative and qualitative methods:
1) Data Collection: Data are drawn from recent reports, such as the World Economic Outlook
[4]
and the Global Financial Stability Report
[7]
, as well as peer-reviewed studies and publicly available datasets.
2) Case Studies: Analyze the impact of supply chain disruptions, speculation in commodity markets, and technological disruptions in digital markets.
3) Qualitative Analysis: Conduct content analysis of policy documents, industry reports, and academic studies to contextualize empirical findings.
3.4. Integration and Synthesis
The final phase integrates insights from theoretical and empirical analyses to provide a holistic understanding of market equilibrium and price formation. Key steps include:
1) Comparative Analysis: Compare theoretical predictions with empirical findings to identify gaps and limitations.
2) Policy Implications: Develop recommendations for policymakers based on the study’s findings.
3) Validation: Validate results through peer review and expert feedback to ensure robustness and reliability.
4. Results and Discussion
This section presents the results of the theoretical and empirical analyses conducted in this study, followed by a discussion of their implications for understanding the dynamics of market equilibrium and price formation. The findings are organized around the key themes of supply and demand interactions, market imperfections, behavioral factors, and external shocks. The discussion integrates insights from both theoretical models and empirical evidence, providing a holistic understanding of price dynamics in competitive and imperfect markets.
4.1. Supply and Demand Interactions
1. Theoretical Findings:
The Walrasian general equilibrium model demonstrates that in competitive markets, prices adjust to balance supply and demand, leading to an efficient allocation of resources
[5]
. However, the model assumes perfect competition, rational behavior, and the absence of externalities, which are rarely observed in real-world markets.
2. Empirical Findings:
The COVID-19 pandemic served as a significant external shock, disrupting global supply chains and causing unprecedented price volatility. For example, the prices of medical supplies, such as personal protective equipment (PPE), surged due to sudden increases in demand and supply constraints
[4]
. In agricultural markets, weather shocks and geopolitical events have led to significant price fluctuations, highlighting the sensitivity of supply and demand to external factors
[22]
.
3. Discussion:
While the Walrasian model provides a useful framework for understanding price formation in competitive markets, it fails to account for the impact of external shocks and market imperfections. Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic and commodity markets underscores the importance of considering real-world complexities in price dynamics.
4.2. Market Imperfections
1. Theoretical Findings:
Game-theoretic models, such as the Bertrand and Cournot models, illustrate how firms in imperfect markets strategically set prices to maximize profits. In monopolistic and oligopolistic markets, firms have the power to influence prices, leading to inefficiencies such as higher prices and reduced output
[21]
. Information asymmetries and externalities further distort price signals, creating market failures that require policy interventions
[1]
.
2. Empirical Findings:
In the pharmaceutical industry, monopolistic practices, such as patent protection, have led to high drug prices and limited access to essential medicines
[1]
. In the tech industry, dominant firms like Google and Amazon have significant market power, which has raised concerns about competition and innovation
[23]
.
3. Discussion:
Market imperfections, such as monopolies and oligopolies, distort price signals and lead to inefficiencies. Empirical evidence from the pharmaceutical and tech industries highlights the need for regulatory frameworks to address monopolistic practices and promote competition.
4.3. Behavioral Factors
1. Theoretical Findings:
Behavioral economic models incorporate psychological factors, such as bounded rationality and consumer biases, into price formation analysis. For example, loss aversion and anchoring can lead to price stickiness and irrational consumer behavior
[2]
. These models challenge the assumption of rational behavior in traditional economic models and provide a more nuanced understanding of price dynamics.
2. Empirical Findings:
In financial markets, behavioral biases, such as loss aversion, have been shown to influence investor behavior and asset prices. For example, investors' reluctance to sell assets at a loss can lead to price stickiness and market inefficiencies
[2]
. In consumer markets, behavioral factors, such as anchoring, can influence price perceptions and purchasing decisions. For example, retailers often use reference prices to anchor consumers' expectations and influence their willingness to pay
[24]
.
3. Discussion:
Behavioral factors play a significant role in price dynamics, particularly in markets where consumer psychology and decision-making are critical. Incorporating behavioral insights into economic models can improve predictions of price dynamics and inform more effective policy design.
4.4. External Shocks
1. Theoretical Findings:
External shocks, such as technological disruptions, geopolitical events, and pandemics, can disrupt market equilibrium and lead to significant price volatility. Theoretical models often struggle to account for the unpredictability and complexity of such shocks.
2. Empirical Findings:
The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruptions to global supply chains, leading to significant price fluctuations in various sectors, including healthcare, food, and energy; the Russia-Ukraine conflict disrupted global energy markets, leading to significant price fluctuations in oil and natural gas. This highlights the vulnerability of markets to geopolitical shocks
[4]
.
3. Discussion:
External shocks can have profound and unpredictable impacts on market equilibrium and price dynamics. Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict underscores the importance of understanding and mitigating the effects of external shocks on market stability.
4.5. Integration of Theoretical and Empirical Insights
The integration of theoretical and empirical insights reveals the complexity of market equilibrium and price formation. While theoretical models provide a foundational understanding of price dynamics, empirical evidence highlights the limitations of these models in explaining real-world phenomena. Key findings include:
1) Market Efficiency: Competitive markets are efficient in allocating resources, but external shocks and imperfections can lead to inefficiencies.
2) Role of Policy: Policymakers must address market failures caused by externalities and information asymmetries through interventions such as Pigovian taxes and transparency regulations.
3) Behavioral Insights: Incorporating behavioral economics into market models can improve predictions of price dynamics and inform more effective policy design.
5. Conclusions and Policy Implications
5.1. Conclusion
The study underscores the complexity of market equilibrium and price formation, emphasizing the intricate interplay between supply and demand, market imperfections, and behavioral factors. While competitive markets are generally efficient in allocating resources, real-world deviations—driven by external shocks, monopolistic practices, and consumer biases—often lead to inefficiencies such as price volatility and resource misallocation. The findings highlight the need for a multifaceted approach to understanding and addressing price dynamics, integrating insights from microeconomic theory, game theory, and behavioral economics. By combining theoretical models with empirical evidence, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving price formation and offers actionable insights for policymakers to enhance market efficiency and stability in an increasingly interconnected global economy.
5.2. Recommendations
To address the challenges identified in this study, policymakers should adopt a multifaceted approach. First, governments should develop resilient supply chain policies, such as establishing strategic reserves of essential goods, diversifying supply sources, and implementing early warning systems, to mitigate the impact of external shocks like pandemics and geopolitical conflicts. Second, regulatory frameworks must be strengthened to promote competition and address market power, including enforcing antitrust laws, encouraging innovation in concentrated markets, and monitoring mergers and acquisitions. Third, policymakers should incorporate behavioral insights into policy design, using nudges to encourage desirable behaviors, designing transparent pricing mechanisms, and educating consumers about cognitive biases. Fourth, externalities and information asymmetries should be addressed through Pigovian taxes, subsidies for positive externalities, and enhanced transparency requirements. Finally, governments and regulatory bodies should invest in data-driven approaches, such as real-time monitoring systems and predictive analytics, to anticipate and mitigate market disruptions. These steps, combined with further research on the impact of digital technologies, global interconnectedness, and behavioral interventions, will be critical in achieving efficient and resilient markets.
Abbreviations

COVID-19

Coronavirus Disease

IMF

International Monetary Fund
Author Contributions
Tesfay Gebrehiwet Abrha: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Brhane Tesfay Weldeyohans: Conceptualization, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). Market imperfections and public policy. American Economic Review, 109(6), 2001–2025.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.2001

[2] Thaler, R. H. (2018). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
[3] Akerlof, G. A. (2020). Behavioral economics and market dynamics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 3–26.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.2.3

[4] International Monetary Fund. (2023). World economic outlook. International Monetary Fund.

https://www.imf.org

[5] Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press.
[6] Fattouh, B., Kilian, L., & Mahadeva, L. (2019). The role of speculation in oil markets: What have we learned so far? The Energy Journal, 40(3), 1–36.

https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.3.bfat

[7] International Monetary Fund. (2022). Global financial stability report. International Monetary Fund.

https://www.imf.org

[8] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
[9] Budish, E., Cramton, P., & Shim, J. (2015). The high-frequency trading arms race: Frequent batch auctions as a market design response. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1547-1621.

https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv027

[10] Carney, M. (2020). Value(s): Building a better world for all. Public Affairs.
[11] Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2021). Token-based platform finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 144(1), 22-47.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.009

[12] Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business Press.
[13] DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315

[14] Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92-101.
[15] Gabaix, X., & Koijen, R. S. (2021). In search of the origins of financial fluctuations: The inelastic markets hypothesis (No. w28967). National Bureau of Economic Research.

https://doi.org/10.3386/w28967

[16] Ivanov, D. (2021). Supply chain viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 59(12), 3535-3552.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852

[17] Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.
[18] Zingales, L. (2015). Does finance benefit society? Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1327-1363.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12295

[19] Smith, A. (2000). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Modern Library. (Original work published 1776).
[20] Marshall, A. (2013). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 1890).
[21] Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press.
[22] Gilbert, C. L. (2020). Commodity price volatility and its impact on market stability. Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 123–145.

https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12567

[23] OECD. (2021). Market power and competition in the digital economy. OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/123456789

[24] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193

Cite This Article
Plain Text BibTeX RIS

  • APA Style

    Abrha, T. G., Weldeyohans, B. T. (2025). The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium: A Theoretical Exploration of Price Formation. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 10(2), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abrha, T. G.; Weldeyohans, B. T. The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium: A Theoretical Exploration of Price Formation. Int. J. Econ. Energy Environ. 2025, 10(2), 46-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abrha TG, Weldeyohans BT. The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium: A Theoretical Exploration of Price Formation. Int J Econ Energy Environ. 2025;10(2):46-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13

    Copy | Download 

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13,
  author = {Tesfay Gebrehiwet Abrha and Brhane Tesfay Weldeyohans},
  title = {The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium: A Theoretical Exploration of Price Formation
},
  journal = {International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {46-51},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeee.20251002.13},
  abstract = {This study provides a comprehensive theoretical and empirical examination of market equilibrium dynamics and price formation mechanisms, analyzing how supply and demand interactions determine prices in both competitive and imperfect markets. Integrating insights from microeconomic theory, game theory, and behavioral economics, the research explores the role of external shocks, market imperfections, and consumer behavior in shaping price dynamics. The study employs the Walrasian general equilibrium model and game-theoretic frameworks to assess market stability, supplemented by empirical case studies on commodity markets, digital economies, and pandemic-induced disruptions. Findings reveal that while competitive markets achieve efficiency through price adjustments, real-world deviations—driven by monopolistic practices, information asymmetries, and behavioral biases often lead to inefficiencies such as price volatility and resource misallocation. External shocks, including geopolitical conflicts (e.g., the Russia-Ukraine war) and health crises (e.g., COVID-19), further disrupt equilibrium, highlighting the vulnerability of global supply chains. The study underscores the limitations of traditional models in capturing behavioral factors like loss aversion and anchoring, which significantly influence consumer decisions and market outcomes. Policy recommendations emphasize the need for resilient supply chain strategies, antitrust enforcement, and behavioral nudges to mitigate distortions. This study blends robust theoretical frameworks with real-world economic data and insights into behavioral patterns to deepen the understanding of price dynamics. It also proposes practical approaches to improve market efficiency in todays globally connected financial landscape.
},
 year = {2025}
}

    Copy | Download 

  • TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium: A Theoretical Exploration of Price Formation

AU  - Tesfay Gebrehiwet Abrha
AU  - Brhane Tesfay Weldeyohans
Y1  - 2025/04/19
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13
T2  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
JF  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
JO  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
SP  - 46
EP  - 51
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5021
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20251002.13
AB  - This study provides a comprehensive theoretical and empirical examination of market equilibrium dynamics and price formation mechanisms, analyzing how supply and demand interactions determine prices in both competitive and imperfect markets. Integrating insights from microeconomic theory, game theory, and behavioral economics, the research explores the role of external shocks, market imperfections, and consumer behavior in shaping price dynamics. The study employs the Walrasian general equilibrium model and game-theoretic frameworks to assess market stability, supplemented by empirical case studies on commodity markets, digital economies, and pandemic-induced disruptions. Findings reveal that while competitive markets achieve efficiency through price adjustments, real-world deviations—driven by monopolistic practices, information asymmetries, and behavioral biases often lead to inefficiencies such as price volatility and resource misallocation. External shocks, including geopolitical conflicts (e.g., the Russia-Ukraine war) and health crises (e.g., COVID-19), further disrupt equilibrium, highlighting the vulnerability of global supply chains. The study underscores the limitations of traditional models in capturing behavioral factors like loss aversion and anchoring, which significantly influence consumer decisions and market outcomes. Policy recommendations emphasize the need for resilient supply chain strategies, antitrust enforcement, and behavioral nudges to mitigate distortions. This study blends robust theoretical frameworks with real-world economic data and insights into behavioral patterns to deepen the understanding of price dynamics. It also proposes practical approaches to improve market efficiency in todays globally connected financial landscape.

VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

    Copy | Download

Author Information
Download PDF
  • Abstract
  • Keywords

  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Literature Review
    3. 3. Methodology
    4. 4. Results and Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusions and Policy Implications
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Author Contributions
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information

About Us

Science Publishing Group (SciencePG) is an Open Access publisher, with more than 300 online, peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.

Learn More About SciencePG

Products

Information

Important Link

Copyright © 2012 -- 2025 Science Publishing Group – All rights reserved.