The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications

Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications

Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi

Published in International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 11, Issue 4)

Received: 27 August 2023 Accepted: 18 September 2023 Published: 26 December 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The concept of justice, a cornerstone in Aristotle's political philosophy, holds intrinsic significance in both historical and contemporary contexts. This article embarks on an intricate exploration of the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's philosophical framework and its far-reaching implications in addressing contemporary challenges. Drawing from Aristotle's perspective on justice within the polis, the article navigates the terrain of his ideas, extending them beyond conventional boundaries and examining their pertinence in the global arena. Aristotle's nuanced definitions of justice lay the foundation for dissecting its role within the community. The dichotomy of distributive and corrective justice adds depth to the discussion, setting the stage for the exploration of justice on a global scale. Indications within Aristotle's writings hint at a broader consideration of justice, encompassing global concerns that transcend political boundaries. The resonance between Aristotle's principles and contemporary global issues, including poverty, environmental degradation, and human rights violations, is brought to light through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This alignment underscores the enduring relevance of Aristotle's philosophy and its potential to inform contemporary ethical paradigms. Furthermore, the article contemplates the influence of Aristotle's justice-centred ideas on international relations, envisioning its impact on diplomacy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. Acknowledging critiques and counterarguments that question the adaptability of Aristotle's theories to modern complexities, the article upholds the enduring applicability of his principles. Aristotle's emphasis on equilibrium and rectification offers a portal for addressing multifaceted global injustices, even in the intricate web of contemporary interdependence. The article culminates in the assertion that the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's political philosophy reverberates profoundly in the present day. The convergence of his principles with contemporary ethical frameworks, the potential implications on international diplomacy, and the adaptability to intricate global challenges substantiate the perpetual wisdom encapsulated in Aristotle's ideas. Embracing the essence of his philosophy, humanity is poised to forge a path toward a more just, harmonious, and equitable world.

Published in	International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 11, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
Page(s)	101-110
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Justice, Diplomacy, Development, Human Rights, Humanity

References

[1]	ADEYINKA, A. A. (2017). THE CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE IN ARISTOTLE’S PHILOSOPHY: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIO-POLITCAL LIFE IN NIGERIA. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies Vol. XX, 2, 155-169.
[2]	Adler, M. D. (2007). Corrective justice and liability for global warming. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(6), 1859-1867.
[3]	Assembly, G. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 11 September 2015. New York: United Nations.
[4]	Atapattu, S. (2020). Climate change and displacement: protecting ‘climate refugees’ within a framework of justice and human rights. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 11(1), 86-113.
[5]	Babatunde, E. O. (2020). Distributive justice in the age of climate change. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 33(2), 263-292.
[6]	Barker, E. (2013). Greek political theory. Routledge.
[7]	Barker, K. (2022). Human rights and redemptive-corrective justice in Bob Marley’s music. Political Messaging in Music and Entertainment Spaces across the Globe. Volume 2., 53.
[8]	Beever, A. (2004). Aristotle on equity, law, and justice. Legal theory, 10(1), 33-50.
[9]	Bhambra, G. K. (2020). Colonial global economy: towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 307-322.
[10]	Boyles, D., Carusi, T., & Attick, D. (2009). Historical and critical interpretations of social justice. Handbook of social justice in education, 2, 30-42.
[11]	Bradshaw, L. (2009). Hobbes and Aristotle: Science and Politics. Matter and Form: From Natural Science to Political Philosophy, 133.
[12]	Brickhouse, T. C. (2014). Aristotle on corrective justice. The Journal of Ethics, 18(3), 187-205.
[13]	Broekman, J. M. (1986). Justice as equilibrium. Law & Phil., 5, 369.
[14]	Brooks, T. (Ed.). (2023). The global justice reader. John Wiley & Sons.
[15]	Bueno, J. L. C. (2017). Economics, chrematistics, oikos and polis in Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. Journal of Philosophical Economics, 10 (Articles).
[16]	Chaleta, E., Saraiva, M., Leal, F., Fialho, I., & Borralho, A. (2021). Higher education and sustainable development goals (SDG)—potential contribution of the undergraduate courses of the school of Social Sciences of the University of Évora. Sustainability, 13(4), 1828.
[17]	Child, C. (2015). Mainstreaming and its discontents: Fairtrade, socially responsible investing, and industry trajectories. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 601-618.
[18]	Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Environmental skill: Motivation, knowledge, and the possibility of a non-romantic environmental ethics. Routledge.
[19]	Cotti, G. (2023). Criminal and Constitutional Populism Under the Aristotelian Framework. Trento Student Law Review, 5(1), 19-67.
[20]	Culp, J. (2020). Special Issue on Global Justice and Education. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 12(01), i-ii.
[21]	Darlington, R. B. (1971). Another look at “cultural fairness” 1. Journal of educational measurement, 8 (2), 71-82.
[22]	Daverth, G., Cassell, C., & Hyde, P. (2016). The subjectivity of fairness: managerial discretion and work–life balance. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(2), 89-107.
[23]	Dawkins, C. E. (2018). Elevating the role of divestment in socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 465-478.
[24]	Edor, E. J. (2020). John Rawls's Concept of Justice as Fairness. PINISI Discretion Review, 4(1), 179-190.
[25]	Endyka, Y. C., Muhdar, M., & Sabaruddin, A. K. (2020). Environmental Justice in Intra Generations: An Overview of Aristotle's Distributive Justice to Coal Mining. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 3(1), 25-34.
[26]	Englard, I. (2009). Corrective and Distributive Justice: from Aristotle to modern times. Oxford University Press.
[27]	Engle, E. (2008). Aristotle, law and justice: The tragic hero. N. Ky. L. Rev., 35, 1.
[28]	Evanoff, R. (2010). Bioregionalism and global ethics: A transactional approach to achieving ecological sustainability, social justice, and human well-being. Routledge.
[29]	Finley, M. I. (2013). Aristotle and Economicanalysis. In Studies in Ancient Society (Routledge Revivals) (pp. 26-52). Routledge.
[30]	Foster, S. E. (1997). Virtues and material goods: Aristotle on justice and liberality. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 71(4), 607-619.
[31]	Frémeaux, S. (2020). A common good perspective on diversity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 200-228.
[32]	Frey, L. R., Pearce, W. B., Pollock, M. A., Artz, L., & Murphy, B. A. (1996). Looking for justice in all the wrong places: On a communication approach to social justice. Communication Studies, 47(1-2), 110-127.
[33]	Gavrielides, T., & Artinopoulou, V. (2016). Reconstructing restorative justice philosophy. Routledge.
[34]	Gerson, L. P. (2017). Aristotle and other Platonists. Cornell University Press.
[35]	Groves, C. (2019). Sustainability and the future: reflections on the ethical and political significance of sustainability. Sustainability Science, 14(4), 915-924.
[36]	Gulseven, O., & Ahmed, G. (2022). The State of Life on Land (SDG 15) in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 13(1), 1-15.
[37]	Guo, S., Lin, X., Coicaud, J. M., Gu, S., Gu, Y., Liu, Q.,... & Zhang, C. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring global justice: Theories, concepts, principles and indicators. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 12, 511-546.
[38]	Hage, M. Y., & Ningrum, P. K. (2022). Corrective Justice and Its Significance on the Private Law. JILS, 7, 1.
[39]	Hall, R. A. (2019). The Justice of War: Its Foundations in Ethics and Natural Law. Lexington Books.
[40]	Hayden, P. (2016). Cosmopolitanism Past and Present. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Ethics and International Relations (pp. 43-62). Routledge.
[41]	Herzog, L. (2021). Global reserve currencies from the perspective of structural global justice: distribution and domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24(7), 931-953.
[42]	Hewitt, A. (2008). Universal justice and epieikeia in Aristotle. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought, 25(1), 115-130.
[43]	Heyman, S. J. (1991). Aristotle on Political Justice. Iowa L. Rev., 77, 851.
[44]	Hutchinson, D. S., & Johnson, M. R. (2012). Protreptic aspects of aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethic.
[45]	Inamura, K. (2015). Justice and Reciprocity in Aristotle's Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
[46]	Jackson, B. (2005). The conceptual history of social justice. Political Studies Review, 3(3), 356-373.
[47]	Jackson, J. H. (2018). Sovereignty-modern: a new approach to an outdated concept. In Relocating Sovereignty (pp. 425-445). Routledge.
[48]	Jang, M. (2018). Aristotle’s political friendship (politike philia) as solidarity. Aristotle on emotions in law and politics, 417-433.
[49]	Knoll, M. A. (2016). The Meaning of Distributive Justice for Aristotle's Theory of Constitutions. Πηγη/Fons, 1, 57-97.
[50]	Kraut, R. (2002). Aristotle: political philosophy. Oxford University Press, USA.
[51]	Kristjánsson, K. (2022). The primacy of civic virtue in Aristotle's politics and its educational implications. History of Political Thought, 43(4), 607-636.
[52]	Lagoutte, S. (2021). The Role of State Actors Within the National Human Rights System. In The Domestic Institutionalisation of Human Rights (pp. 13-30). Routledge.
[53]	Landman, T. (2002). Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction. routledge.
[54]	Laplante, L. J. (2014). The plural justice aims of reparations. Transitional justice theories, 66-84.
[55]	Lenzen, M., Li, M., Malik, A., Pomponi, F., Sun, Y. Y., Wiedmann, T.,... & Yousefzadeh, M. (2020). Global socio-economic losses and environmental gains from the Coronavirus pandemic. PloS one, 15(7), e0235654.
[56]	Leontsini, E. (2021). Egalitarian Aristotelianism: Common Interest, Justice, and the Art of Politics.
[57]	Ludwig, P. W. (2020). Rediscovering Political Friendship: Aristotle's Theory and Modern Identity, Community, and Equality. Cambridge University Press.
[58]	Maffi, A. (2021). The Role of the Law in the Classification of Democratic Constitutions in Aristotle, Pol. IV. FILOSOFICKY CASOPIS, 125-142.
[59]	Marseille, E., & Kahn, J. G. (2019). Utilitarianism and the ethical foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis in resource allocation for global health. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 14(1), 1-7.
[60]	Maurya, S. K. (2021). The concept of justice in reference with philosophies of Plato and Aristotle: a critical study. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 7(3), 250-266.
[61]	Milani, F. (2021). COVID-19 outbreak, social response, and early economic effects: a global VAR analysis of cross-country interdependencies. Journal of population economics, 34(1), 223-252.
[62]	Mill, J. S. (2016). Utilitarianism. In Seven masterpieces of philosophy (pp. 329-375). Routledge.
[63]	Moody-Adams, M. (2023). Philosophy and the Art of Human Flourishing. Philosophy and Human Flourishing, 280.
[64]	Moroni, S. (2020). The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice. Planning Theory, 19(3), 251-267.
[65]	Mukherjee, S., & Ramaswamy, S. (2011). A history of political thought: Plato to Marx. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd..
[66]	Nasution, A. R. (2017, December). Acts of terrorism as a crime against humanity in the aspect Of law and human rights. In 2nd International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2017) (pp. 346-353). Atlantis Press.
[67]	Neral, A. (2013). The Theories of Justice and its Correlation with Law. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 151-160.
[68]	Nielsen, K. (2019). World government, security, and global justice. In Problems of international justice (pp. 263-282). Routledge.
[69]	Okin, S. M. (1987). Justice and gender. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42-72.
[70]	Oko Elechi, O., Morris, S. V., & Schauer, E. J. (2010). Restoring justice (ubuntu): an African perspective. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(1), 73-85.
[71]	Papouli, E. (2019). Aristotle’s virtue ethics as a conceptual framework for the study and practice of social work in modern times. European Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 921-934.
[72]	Peterson, A. (2020). Character education, the individual and the political. Journal of Moral Education, 49(2), 143-157.
[73]	Rafiq, J. (2021). Role of United Nations in Post Cold War Era: Iraq Invasion as a Case Study. Indian JL & Legal Rsch., 2, 1.
[74]	Ramanujam, N., Caivano, N., & Agnello, A. (2019). Distributive justice and the sustainable development goals: Delivering agenda 2030 in India. Law and Development Review, 12(2), 495-536.
[75]	Reyers, B., & Selig, E. R. (2020). Global targets that reveal the social–ecological interdependencies of sustainable development. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(8), 1011-1019.
[76]	Said, M. Y., & Nurhayati, Y. (2021). A review on Rawls Theory of Justice. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 1(1), 29-36.
[77]	Samuels, R., & Samuels, R. (2020). Logos, global justice, and the reality principle. Zizek and the Rhetorical Unconscious: Global Politics, Philosophy, and Subjectivity, 65-86.
[78]	Sandler, R. L. (2013). Environmental virtue ethics. International encyclopedia of ethics.
[79]	Schwarzenbach, S. A. (1996). On civic friendship. Ethics, 107(1), 97-128.
[80]	Sellers, B. G., & Arrigo, B. A. (2022). The narrative framework of psychological jurisprudence: Virtue ethics as criminal justice practice. Aggression and violent behavior, 63, 101671.
[81]	Simonelli, A. C. (2021). Climate displacement and the legal gymnastics of justice: is it all political?. Ethics & International Affairs, 35(2), 303-312.
[82]	Simpson, P. (2014). Aristotle on Natural Justice. Studia Gilsoniana, (3), 367-376.
[83]	Sison, A. J. G., Ferrero, I., & Redín, D. M. (2020). Some virtue ethics implications from Aristotelian and Confucian perspectives on family and business. Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 241-254.
[84]	Stalley, R. F. (1989). Justice and Law in Plato and Aristotle-Spiro Panagiotou (ed.): Justice, Law and Method in Plato and Aristotle. Pp. iv+ 210. Edmonton, Alberta: Academic Printing and Publishing, 1987. Paper, Can $18.95. The Classical Review, 39(2), 256-257.
[85]	Thapa, P., Mainali, B., & Dhakal, S. (2023). Focus on Climate Action: What Level of Synergy and Trade-Off Is There between SDG 13; Climate Action and Other SDGs in Nepal?. Energies, 16(1), 566.
[86]	Thornton, F. (2021). Of harm, culprits and rectification: Obtaining corrective justice for climate change displacement. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(1), 13-33.
[87]	Van Hoef, Y., & Oelsner, A. (2018). Friendship and positive peace: Conceptualising friendship in politics and international relations. Politics and Governance, 6(4), 115-124.
[88]	Weinrib, E. J. (1989). Aristotle's Forms of Justice. Ratio Juris, 2(3), 211-226.
[89]	Weinrib, E. J. (2002). Corrective justice in a nutshell. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 52(4), 349-356.
[90]	Weinrib, E. J. (2020). The gains and losses of corrective justice. In Restitution (pp. 547-567). Routledge.
[91]	Wonders, N. A., & Jones, L. C. (2021). Challenging the borders of difference and inequality: Power in migration as a social movement for global justice. Handbook of Migration and Global Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 296-313.
[92]	Yack, B. (2023). The problems of a political animal: Community, justice, and conflict in Aristotelian political thought. Univ of California Press.
[93]	Young, C. M. (2006). Aristotle's justice. The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 179-197.
[94]	Zabaniotou, A. (2020). A systemic approach to resilience and ecological sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Human, societal, and ecological health as a system-wide emergent property in the Anthropocene. Global transitions, 2, 116-126. [Original source: https://studycrumb.com/alphabetizer]

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alabi, J. O. (2023). The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications. International Journal of Philosophy, 11(4), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alabi, J. O. The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications. Int. J. Philos. 2023, 11(4), 101-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alabi JO. The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications. Int J Philos. 2023;11(4):101-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12,
  author = {Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi},
  title = {The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {11},
  number = {4},
  pages = {101-110},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20231104.12},
  abstract = {The concept of justice, a cornerstone in Aristotle's political philosophy, holds intrinsic significance in both historical and contemporary contexts. This article embarks on an intricate exploration of the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's philosophical framework and its far-reaching implications in addressing contemporary challenges. Drawing from Aristotle's perspective on justice within the polis, the article navigates the terrain of his ideas, extending them beyond conventional boundaries and examining their pertinence in the global arena. Aristotle's nuanced definitions of justice lay the foundation for dissecting its role within the community. The dichotomy of distributive and corrective justice adds depth to the discussion, setting the stage for the exploration of justice on a global scale. Indications within Aristotle's writings hint at a broader consideration of justice, encompassing global concerns that transcend political boundaries. The resonance between Aristotle's principles and contemporary global issues, including poverty, environmental degradation, and human rights violations, is brought to light through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This alignment underscores the enduring relevance of Aristotle's philosophy and its potential to inform contemporary ethical paradigms. Furthermore, the article contemplates the influence of Aristotle's justice-centred ideas on international relations, envisioning its impact on diplomacy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. Acknowledging critiques and counterarguments that question the adaptability of Aristotle's theories to modern complexities, the article upholds the enduring applicability of his principles. Aristotle's emphasis on equilibrium and rectification offers a portal for addressing multifaceted global injustices, even in the intricate web of contemporary interdependence. The article culminates in the assertion that the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's political philosophy reverberates profoundly in the present day. The convergence of his principles with contemporary ethical frameworks, the potential implications on international diplomacy, and the adaptability to intricate global challenges substantiate the perpetual wisdom encapsulated in Aristotle's ideas. Embracing the essence of his philosophy, humanity is poised to forge a path toward a more just, harmonious, and equitable world.
},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications
AU  - Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi
Y1  - 2023/12/26
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 101
EP  - 110
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
AB  - The concept of justice, a cornerstone in Aristotle's political philosophy, holds intrinsic significance in both historical and contemporary contexts. This article embarks on an intricate exploration of the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's philosophical framework and its far-reaching implications in addressing contemporary challenges. Drawing from Aristotle's perspective on justice within the polis, the article navigates the terrain of his ideas, extending them beyond conventional boundaries and examining their pertinence in the global arena. Aristotle's nuanced definitions of justice lay the foundation for dissecting its role within the community. The dichotomy of distributive and corrective justice adds depth to the discussion, setting the stage for the exploration of justice on a global scale. Indications within Aristotle's writings hint at a broader consideration of justice, encompassing global concerns that transcend political boundaries. The resonance between Aristotle's principles and contemporary global issues, including poverty, environmental degradation, and human rights violations, is brought to light through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This alignment underscores the enduring relevance of Aristotle's philosophy and its potential to inform contemporary ethical paradigms. Furthermore, the article contemplates the influence of Aristotle's justice-centred ideas on international relations, envisioning its impact on diplomacy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. Acknowledging critiques and counterarguments that question the adaptability of Aristotle's theories to modern complexities, the article upholds the enduring applicability of his principles. Aristotle's emphasis on equilibrium and rectification offers a portal for addressing multifaceted global injustices, even in the intricate web of contemporary interdependence. The article culminates in the assertion that the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's political philosophy reverberates profoundly in the present day. The convergence of his principles with contemporary ethical frameworks, the potential implications on international diplomacy, and the adaptability to intricate global challenges substantiate the perpetual wisdom encapsulated in Aristotle's ideas. Embracing the essence of his philosophy, humanity is poised to forge a path toward a more just, harmonious, and equitable world.

VL  - 11
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi

Department of Philosophy, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

Contact Email

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alabi, J. O. (2023). The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications. International Journal of Philosophy, 11(4), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alabi, J. O. The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications. Int. J. Philos. 2023, 11(4), 101-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alabi JO. The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications. Int J Philos. 2023;11(4):101-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12,
  author = {Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi},
  title = {The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {11},
  number = {4},
  pages = {101-110},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20231104.12},
  abstract = {The concept of justice, a cornerstone in Aristotle's political philosophy, holds intrinsic significance in both historical and contemporary contexts. This article embarks on an intricate exploration of the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's philosophical framework and its far-reaching implications in addressing contemporary challenges. Drawing from Aristotle's perspective on justice within the polis, the article navigates the terrain of his ideas, extending them beyond conventional boundaries and examining their pertinence in the global arena. Aristotle's nuanced definitions of justice lay the foundation for dissecting its role within the community. The dichotomy of distributive and corrective justice adds depth to the discussion, setting the stage for the exploration of justice on a global scale. Indications within Aristotle's writings hint at a broader consideration of justice, encompassing global concerns that transcend political boundaries. The resonance between Aristotle's principles and contemporary global issues, including poverty, environmental degradation, and human rights violations, is brought to light through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This alignment underscores the enduring relevance of Aristotle's philosophy and its potential to inform contemporary ethical paradigms. Furthermore, the article contemplates the influence of Aristotle's justice-centred ideas on international relations, envisioning its impact on diplomacy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. Acknowledging critiques and counterarguments that question the adaptability of Aristotle's theories to modern complexities, the article upholds the enduring applicability of his principles. Aristotle's emphasis on equilibrium and rectification offers a portal for addressing multifaceted global injustices, even in the intricate web of contemporary interdependence. The article culminates in the assertion that the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's political philosophy reverberates profoundly in the present day. The convergence of his principles with contemporary ethical frameworks, the potential implications on international diplomacy, and the adaptability to intricate global challenges substantiate the perpetual wisdom encapsulated in Aristotle's ideas. Embracing the essence of his philosophy, humanity is poised to forge a path toward a more just, harmonious, and equitable world.
},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Primacy of Global Justice in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy: Exploring Contemporary Implications
AU  - Jonathan Oluwapelumi Alabi
Y1  - 2023/12/26
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 101
EP  - 110
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231104.12
AB  - The concept of justice, a cornerstone in Aristotle's political philosophy, holds intrinsic significance in both historical and contemporary contexts. This article embarks on an intricate exploration of the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's philosophical framework and its far-reaching implications in addressing contemporary challenges. Drawing from Aristotle's perspective on justice within the polis, the article navigates the terrain of his ideas, extending them beyond conventional boundaries and examining their pertinence in the global arena. Aristotle's nuanced definitions of justice lay the foundation for dissecting its role within the community. The dichotomy of distributive and corrective justice adds depth to the discussion, setting the stage for the exploration of justice on a global scale. Indications within Aristotle's writings hint at a broader consideration of justice, encompassing global concerns that transcend political boundaries. The resonance between Aristotle's principles and contemporary global issues, including poverty, environmental degradation, and human rights violations, is brought to light through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This alignment underscores the enduring relevance of Aristotle's philosophy and its potential to inform contemporary ethical paradigms. Furthermore, the article contemplates the influence of Aristotle's justice-centred ideas on international relations, envisioning its impact on diplomacy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. Acknowledging critiques and counterarguments that question the adaptability of Aristotle's theories to modern complexities, the article upholds the enduring applicability of his principles. Aristotle's emphasis on equilibrium and rectification offers a portal for addressing multifaceted global injustices, even in the intricate web of contemporary interdependence. The article culminates in the assertion that the primacy of global justice within Aristotle's political philosophy reverberates profoundly in the present day. The convergence of his principles with contemporary ethical frameworks, the potential implications on international diplomacy, and the adaptability to intricate global challenges substantiate the perpetual wisdom encapsulated in Aristotle's ideas. Embracing the essence of his philosophy, humanity is poised to forge a path toward a more just, harmonious, and equitable world.

VL  - 11
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download